rexresearch.com
rexresearch1.com
Luc MONTAGNIER
Digital Remote Homeopathy Patents / Applications
Digital Remote Homeopathy Patents / Applications
https://homeopathyeurope.org/luc-montagnier-1932-2022/
Luc Montagnier
(1932-2022)
We pay tribute to Luc Montagnier, who has passed away at his home in Neuilly, at the age of 89. He is fondly remembered by his many friends and admirers from all around the world. We salute his memory and send our sincere condolences to his family.
Over the years it has sometimes happened that a top researcher, who has no previous track record in the field of homeopathy, accidentally makes an observation or has an idea that leads to a scientific result in support of this treatment. This seredipitous observation of an idea is an important moment, but to follow it through and open a new line of investigation in a publication is what makes it useful and demonstrates that the scientist is curious and open-minded.
Luc Montagnier investigated how to detect specific infections at an early stage via very small amounts of immunologic indicators (2009). As part of this work, he passed colonies of a micro-organism (Mycoplasma piri) through a filter that allowed only chemical compounds of around the size of amino acids to pass through. There is therefore no conceivable way for any complex information such as is carried by DNA or RNA to get through. And yet, when Montagnier inoculated a fresh Petri dish with this filtrate, a few weeks later full-blown colonies of Mycoplasma piri grew! This phenomenon could not be explained in material, local terms, and thus it supports the notion that homeopathic dilutions beyond Avogadro’s number can have biological and therefore also medically-beneficial effects. This experiment further supports what was formerly called the memory of water theory, originally postulated by Jacques Benveniste (1988). Currently, there is no generally-accepted explanation for these phenomena, but some have proposed that a transfer of biological information is taking place. Even more importantly, it is one of a series of experiments that mean it is no longer possible to state that homeopathy cannot work because there is nothing in it but water.
At that time, Montagnier was still active as a researcher and was dependent on financial support. Nevertheless, he had the courage to speak up about homeopathy (High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules.), risking support for his scientific work.
In 1988, Benveniste lost financial support for his pioneering work. Consequently, Montagnier regarded Benveniste as a modern-day Galileo. The publication of Montagnier’s results was met with utter disbelief and was attacked because of a lack of precision regarding the testing methods used, and because the peer review process of the journal, of which he was editor, was too short to be credible. It was curious to see how the scientific community was ready to support the attacks on Benveniste, accepting his defamation by a juggler, a fraud expert and a journalist – three non-scientific experts who would not normally be allowed anywhere near a laboratory containing the extremely sensitive instruments with which Benveniste measured his work. Montagnier was, of course, aware of the risk he was taking.
It is noteworthy that there is a complete absence of publications trying to replicate Montagnier’s experiments. This is strange, considering that conventional medicine clearly cannot claim to be able to cure all patients. It is not a fault that biomedicine does not have all the necessary tools to help in all cases, but a little more modesty would be appropriate, honourable and also scientific. We also know that homeopathic research proposals are acknowledged as sound but are nevertheless refused because researchers are afraid to lose their reputation by being associated with homeopathy. Maybe that other great French scientist was right to take Pasteur’s secret to his grave (Coulter, 1994).
We are grateful for Montagnier’s courage, because science, all too humanly, tends to become defensive when it is challenged out of its comfort zone.
Jean Pierre Jansen
President, European Committee for Homeopathy
References
Coulter HL. The divided legacy. A history of the schism in medical thought, volume I-IV. Berkeley: North Atlantic Books; 1994
Davenas E, Beauvais F, Amara J et al. Human basophil degranulation triggered by very dilute antiserum against IgE. Nature. 1988;333:816-818.
Enserink M. French Nobelist Escapes ‘Intellectual Terror’ to Pursue Radical Ideas in China. Science. 2010
Montagnier L, Aissa J, Ferris S, Montagnier JL, Lavallée C. Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences. Interdiscip Sci Comput Life Sci. 2009; 81-90.
Montagnier L, Aissa J, del Giudice E, Lavallee C, Tedeschi A, Vitiello G. DNA waves and water. Journal of Physics: Conference Series. 2011;306:012007.
Montagnier L, Del Giudice E, Aïssa J et al. Transduction of DNA information through water and electromagnetic waves. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015;34:106-112.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luc_Montagnier
Luc
Montagnier
Luc Montagnier (US: /ˌmɒntənˈjeɪ,
ˌmoʊntɑːnˈjeɪ/ MON-tən-YAY, MOHN-tahn-YAY,[2][3] French: [lyk
mɔ̃taɲje]; 18 August 1932 – 8 February 2022) was a French
virologist and joint recipient, with Françoise Barré-Sinoussi
and Harald zur Hausen, of the 2008 Nobel Prize in Physiology or
Medicine for his discovery of the human immunodeficiency virus
(HIV).[4] He worked as a researcher at the Pasteur Institute in
Paris and as a full-time professor at Shanghai Jiao Tong
University in China.[5]In 2017 he was criticised by other academics for using his Nobel prize status to "spread dangerous health messages outside of his field of knowledge";[6] during the COVID-19 pandemic, Montagnier promoted[clarification needed] the conspiracy theory that SARS-CoV-2, the causative virus, was deliberately created and escaped from a laboratory.[7] Such a claim has been rejected by other virologists.[8][9][10]...
Controversies : Electromagnetic signals from DNA / DNA teleportation
In 2009, Montagnier published two controversial independent research studies, one of which was entitled "Electromagnetic Signals Are Produced by Aqueous Nanostructures Derived from Bacterial DNA Sequences".[43][44] Jeff Reimers, of the University of Sydney, said that if its conclusions are true, "these would be the most significant experiments performed in the past 90 years, demanding re-evaluation of the whole conceptual framework of modern chemistry".[45] The paper concluded that diluted DNA from pathogenic bacterial and viral species was able to emit "specific radio waves" and that "these radio waves [are] associated with 'nanostructures' in the solution that might be able to recreate the pathogen".[43]
They were published in a new journal, of which he was chair of the editorial board,[46] allegedly[45] detecting electromagnetic signals from bacterial DNA (M. pirum and E. coli) in water that had been prepared using agitation and high dilutions,[47] and similar research on electromagnetic detection of HIV RNA in the blood of AIDS patients treated by antiretroviral therapy.[48] ...
Homeopathy
On 28 June 2010, Montagnier spoke at the Lindau Nobel Laureate Meeting in Germany,[52] "where 60 Nobel prize winners had gathered, along with 700 other scientists, to discuss the latest breakthroughs in medicine, chemistry and physics."[53] He "stunned his colleagues ... when he presented a new method for detecting viral infections that bore close parallels to the basic tenets of homeopathy. Although fellow Nobel prize winners – who view homeopathy as quackery – were left openly shaking their heads, Montagnier's comments were rapidly embraced by homeopaths eager for greater credibility. Cristal Sumner, of the British Homeopathic Association, said Montagnier's work gave homeopathy 'a true scientific ethos'."[53]
When asked by Canada's CBC Marketplace program if his work was indeed a theoretical basis for homeopathy as homeopaths had claimed, Montagnier replied that one "cannot extrapolate it to the products used in homeopathy".[54]
Responses, criticisms, and interviews
The homeopathy paper met with harsh criticism for not being peer-reviewed, and its claims unsubstantiated by modern mainstream conventions of physics and chemistry. In response to Montagnier's statement that the generally unfavorable response is due to the "non-understanding or misunderstanding of the breakthrough findings", blogger Andy Lewis has written that he has found it difficult to assert what the paper "actually claims", saying: "The paper ... lacks any rigour. ... important experimental steps are described dismissively in a sentence and little attempt is made to describe the detail of the work".[55] While homeopaths claim his research as support for homeopathy, many scientists have greeted it with scorn and harsh criticism.[45][56][57]
In a 24 December 2010 Science magazine interview entitled "French Nobelist Escapes 'Intellectual Terror' to Pursue Radical Ideas in China", he was questioned about his research and plans. In the interview he stated that Jacques Benveniste, whose controversial homeopathic work had been discredited, was "a modern Galileo". When asked if he was not "worried that your colleagues will think you have drifted into pseudo-science", he replied: "No, because it's not pseudoscience. It's not quackery. These are real phenomena which deserve further study." He also mentioned that his applications for funding had been turned down and that he was leaving his home country to set up shop in China so he could escape what he called the "intellectual terror" which he claimed had prevented others from publishing their results. He stated that China's Shanghai Jiao Tong University is more "open minded" to his research.[58] There he was chairman of the editorial board[46] of a new journal which published his research.[58]
Montagnier was also questioned on his beliefs about homeopathy, to which he replied: "I can't say that homeopathy is right in everything. What I can say now is that the high dilutions are right. High dilutions of something are not nothing. They are water structures which mimic the original molecules. We find that with DNA, we cannot work at the extremely high dilutions used in homeopathy; we cannot go further than a 10−18 dilution, or we lose the signal. But even at 10−18, you can calculate that there is not a single molecule of DNA left. And yet we detect a signal."[58]
A 12 January 2011 New Scientist editorial described the controversial nature of the research, while also noting how many researchers "reacted with disbelief", with chemist and university president Gary Schuster comparing it to "pathological science".[45] Evolutionary biologist PZ Myers also described the work as "pathological science". He described the paper as "one of the more unprofessional write-ups I've ever run across",[56] and criticized the publication process as having an "unbelievable turnaround" time: "another suspicious sign are the dates. This paper was submitted on 3 January 2009, revised on 5 January 2009, and accepted on 6 January 2009", leading him to ask: "Who reviewed this, the author's mother? Maybe someone even closer. Guess who the chairman of the editorial board is: Luc Montagnier."[56][59]
On 25 May 2012, he gave the keynote address[60] at the 2012 conference for AutismOne, an anti-vaccination group. Similar to the controversy he aroused by extolling homeopathy, his latest group, Chronimed, claimed to have made a discovery for autistic children that was sharply criticized by computational biologist Steven Salzberg.[61]
In 2017, 106 academic scientists wrote an open letter "calling [Montagnier] to order". The letter read: "We, academics of medicine, cannot accept that one of our peers is using his Nobel prize [status] to spread dangerous health messages outside of his field of knowledge."[62]
For his defense of such anti-scientific views, Montagnier has been cited as an example of the phenomenon called Nobel disease.[63][64]
https://www.researchgate.net/publication/333339366_Water_Memory/link/5ce7a38e299bf14d95b535e2/download?_tp=eyJjb250ZXh0Ijp7ImZpcnN0UGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIiwicGFnZSI6InB1YmxpY2F0aW9uIn19
Transduction of DNA information through water and electromagnetic waves
Luc Montagniera, et al
[ PDF ]
Patents
WO2012142568
// US2012024701
Remote Transmission of Electromagnetic Signals Inducing Nanostructures Amplifiable into a Specific DNA Sequence
[ PDF ]
Remote Transmission of Electromagnetic Signals Inducing Nanostructures Amplifiable into a Specific DNA Sequence
[ PDF ]
A general method for identifying both known and unknown DNA sequences at the origin of EMS, including DNA sequences in the plasma of patients suffering of chronic diseases such as Alzheimer, Parkinson, multiple sclerosis, rheumatoid arthritis, and other similar diseases, disorders and conditions. The invention is based on the discovery that: (1) The nanostructures induced by DNA sequences in water or other dipole solutions can faithfully reflect the information contained in these sequences at dilutions which do not contain anymore of that DNA, as evidenced by the fact that it can be retranscribed into the same DNA sequence by the polymerases and reagents used in classical polymerase chain reaction (PCR); (2) this information can be transmitted at a distance in water or other dipole solutions by EMS emitted by the nanostructures; and (3) EMS signatures of nanostructures containing this information can be detected, stored, transmitted, transduced and imprinted in water or other dipole solutions.
A system and method for inducing cytotoxicity, comprising a receiver configured to receive an electromagnetic signal from a container, using a receiver configured to capture electromagnetic emissions from the container over a frequency range of at least 100 Hz to 10,000 Hz; an amplifier configured to amplify the received electromagnetic signal; and an emitter configured to emit the amplified electromagnetic signal in proximity to living cells. DNA from a pathogen is amplified using PCR, purified, and serially diluted. Electromagnetic signals from the diluted DNA are received, and optionally stored. The receive signal is amplified and emitted in proximity to living cells, to produce under selected circumstances, a cytopathic effect.
US2013217000
(A1)
Method for Characterizing a Biologically Active Biochemical Element by Analysing Low Frequency Electromagnetic Signals
[ PDF ]
A method for
characterizing a biologically active biochemical element in a
sample by prefiltering the sample and analyzing low frequency
electromagnetic signals transmitted by the prefiltered solution.
The prefiltering may be through a 150 nm or less filter. The
prefiltering may be subsequent to a dilution, e.g., between 10-2
and 10-20 in water. The filtered sample may be stirred and/or
centrifuged. During the analyzing, the solution may be excited
using white noise. The analyzing may comprise comparing a
signature with previously recorded signatures.Method for Characterizing a Biologically Active Biochemical Element by Analysing Low Frequency Electromagnetic Signals
[ PDF ]
CN111313936A
A method of copying and memorizing material information
A method of copying and memorizing material information
The present invention relates to the technical field of information replication, and specifically, to a method of replicating and memorizing material information.
Background technique
Nobel Prize winner in Physiology Luc Montagnier and others disclosed in Transduction of DNA information through water and electromagnetic waves (Electromagnetic biology and medicine 34, 106-112) that DNA information can be copied into water.
Konstantin Meyl et al. disclosed in Drug effects in yeast mediated by scalar waves (Medical Science, 2014, 8(30),58-62) that clotrimazole information was directly copied to yeast through scalar waves and produced 49% Inhibitory effect; in Biological Signals Transmitted by Longitudinal Waves Influencing the Growth of Plants (Proc. of the Second Intl.
Conf. on Advances In Bio-Informatics, Bio-Technology and Environmental Engineering- ABBE 2014), gibberellin information was directly applied to bean sprouts through scalar wave replication, and an obvious promoting effect was obtained.
Research by Luc Montagnier, Konstantin Meyl and others has proven that material (DNA, clotrimazole, gibberellin, etc.) information can be transmitted and copied over a certain space and distance through electromagnetic waves, reflecting the corresponding biological effects of the material.
Dr. Tang Qing and others provided a method for copying material information into water (CN201711002686.8), which uses the action of electromagnetic fields to copy the material solution information in one container to another in direct contact. The ultrapure water in the container provides an effective means for the preparation of homeopathic medicines, water information research, and basic research on biomolecular interactions.
In the Method for digital transduction of DNA in living cells (US2016/0002620 A1), Luc Montagnier and others transcribed the pathogenic DNA signal into an electromagnetic signal, and then played the electromagnetic signal to the living cells, causing cell pathology, and also provided a material information replication and transcribe the expression.
Today, with the rapid development of biomedicine, problems such as drug side effects, painful treatments, and biological incompatibility during research are still important aspects that trouble biological and medical researchers. If the information on DNA, drugs and other substances can be collected through appropriate means, Copying, transcribing and expressing corresponding receptors in water or living cells, and achieving corresponding effects at the same time, will provide new effective means for biological and medical research, as well as new methods for medical treatment.
Some of the existing technologies require that the material information be copied into ultrapure water for further action, and the material information source and the receiving source must be in direct contact during the copying process (CN201711002686.8); some require that the material information be transcribed into electromagnetic signals before further processing. Transcription (US2016/0002620 A1), the operation is relatively complex.
Although some technologies can directly copy and transcribe material information to cells, organisms or other targets, they require drugs and other substances to be copied to be placed at the information transmitter for a long time, and many of these substances need to be stored at low temperature or protected from light. Placing the information transmitter for a long time will cause rapid consumption or deterioration of the material due to temperature, light, resonance and other factors. Placing the information transmitter in an environment required for the material to be copied will bring inconvenience to the operation and may even affect the information. Copy effect.
Contents of the invention
In view of this, the present invention proposes a method for copying and memorizing material information, aiming to solve the above problems existing in the prior art.
Specifically, the present invention proposes a method for copying and memorizing material information, which includes the following steps:
Step (1), prepare the substance to be copied.
Specifically, the replicating substance is DNA, a biologically active drug monomer or a complex.
Among them, the DNA is a DNA fragment of a virus, a microorganism, a plant or an animal, such as a 1.5-3 kbp fragment of the Mycoplasma piriformis adhesion gene, etc.
DNA can also be the living body itself, such as the parasites in the red blood cells of HIV patients.
More specifically, biologically active drugs are chemical drugs or traditional Chinese medicines containing polyconjugated structures, benzene rings or heterocyclic rings.
For example, clotrimazole, vitamin A, gibberellins, etc.
The information targets water, cells, organisms, organs, human body parts or wholes that require treatment or physiotherapy.
Step (2), adjust the connected transmitting coil and receiving coil to a resonance state.
Specifically, as shown in Figure 1, the device for copying and memorizing material information in this embodiment includes: two connected coils, one of which serves as the transmitting end and the other as the receiving end. The two coils are Just adjust it to the resonance state.
During specific implementation, the connected transmitting coil and receiving coil are adjusted to a resonance state with the same frequency, the same waveform, and opposite phase, thereby generating a scalar wave.
The intensity can be increased or decreased according to actual needs.
The transmitting end and receiving end can also be deformed or improved according to actual needs.
In step (3), the powder or solution of the substance to be copied is placed in the electromagnetic coil at the transmitting end, the material information is memorized through electromagnetic resonance, and the substance to be copied is taken out after a period of time.
Specifically, the time for information copying can be timed from when the substance to be copied is placed in the transmitter coil and the transmitter coil and the receiver coil begin to resonate. In practical applications, the information copy time can be shortened according to needs.
For example, the time for copying information can be a few hours, 1 day, 2 days, etc.
Step (4): Place the information target in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end to receive the signal of the substance to be copied, so that the information of the substance to be copied has an effect on the target.
Specifically, the action time can be controlled according to actual needs. For example, copying the information of clotrimazole can act on yeast to inhibit its growth. Since yeast grows relatively fast, it can act for several hours; copying the information of gibberellin can act on bean sprouts. To promote its growth, it takes dozens or even hundreds of hours because its growth is relatively slow.
Step (4): After the effect is maintained for a certain period of time, repeat the copying and memorizing steps of steps (2) and (3) to maintain the repeated copying and memory of the material information.
Specifically, the effect maintenance time can be adjusted according to the actual operation requirements and effects. For example, the information can be copied and remembered again after the information effect is maintained for 1 day, or the information can be copied and remembered again after the information effect is maintained for 6 days.
According to quantum field theory, the water structure is an inhomogeneous structure balanced between coherent and incoherent states. When the electromagnetic signal of a drug placed in a scalar wave resonates with the coherent domain frequency of water, it will cause hydrogen bond dipole motion of water molecules. The reconstruction then causes the structures to resonate and coherence with each other to generate new relevant phases, forming a structure or functional group similar to the drug.
Since all cells and organisms contain a large amount of water, the target placed at the signal receiving end is cells, living organisms or corresponding water culture systems containing water. There is a sufficient water environment, so the water receives and copies the information of the drug and then responds The object of action produces the corresponding drug effect.
The method for copying and memorizing material information provided in the present invention places the material to be copied at the transmitter in a short period of time. After copying the information, it can be taken out and put back into the appropriate environment. The memorized information can be used to act on the corresponding target and realize the material realization. The non-contact effect effectively reduces the consumption or deterioration of the material to be copied, extends its service life, and is easy to operate and implement.
Description of the drawings
Figure 1 is a schematic structural diagram of a device for copying and memorizing material information in the present invention;
Figure 2 is a comparison chart of the inhibition rates when the blank signal and clotrimazole information are copied and memorized and then act on the yeast inoculated on the solid plate in Example 1 of the present invention;
Figure 3 is a comparison chart of the inhibition rates when the clotrimazole information was copied and memorized three times and then acted on the yeast inoculated on the solid plate in Example 2 of the present invention;
Figure 4 is a comparison chart of the inhibition rates when the clotrimazole information was copied and memorized three times and then acted on the bacterial liquid in Example 3 of the present invention.
Detailed ways
The following are some embodiments of the present invention. It should be noted that those of ordinary skill in the art can make several improvements and modifications without departing from the principles of the present invention. These improvements and modifications are also regarded as It is the protection scope of the present invention.
Clotrimazole is a broad-spectrum antifungal drug that has significant inhibitory and killing effects on yeast. It is often used clinically for the treatment of antifungal infections.
The embodiment of the present invention takes copying and memorizing clotrimazole information and acting on yeast as an example to illustrate the operation process and effect of the method of the present invention.
Inhibition rate = (control group OD600 - experimental group OD600)/control group OD600*100%
Example 1
Adjust the transmitting end electromagnetic coil and the receiving end electromagnetic coil so that they are in the resonance state with the same frequency, the same waveform and opposite phase.
Place the empty glass bottle in the electromagnetic coil at the transmitting end. After copying and memorizing the blank signal for 1 day, remove the empty bottle and place a solid plate newly coated with a certain amount of yeast in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group and the control group. Placed outside the resonance field, other conditions are the same, and three parallel samples are set up in both the experimental group and the control group.
After culturing for 42 hours at room temperature (25°C), rinse all the colonies with sterile water to constant volume, measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600nm, and calculate the inhibition rate.
Stop the electromagnetic field resonance to dissipate the blank effect of the memory. After 1 day, put the electromagnetic field in the resonance state again, add the prepared clotrimazole to the empty glass bottle, place it in the electromagnetic coil of the transmitter, copy and memorize the clotrimazole signal 1 After 3 days, remove the clotrimazole bottle and place the solid plate newly coated with a certain number of yeasts in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group. The control group is placed outside the resonance field. Both the experimental group and the control group are set up with 3 parallel After culturing for 42 hours, rinse all the colonies with sterile water to constant volume, measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600nm, and calculate the inhibition rate.
It can be seen from Figure 2 that the blank information copied and memorized by the coil has an inhibition rate of -8.2% on yeast, but has a certain promoting effect, which may be the effect of the scalar wave itself on yeast; the clotrimazole signal copied and memorized by the coil The inhibition rate of yeast is 12.7%, which has obvious inhibitory effect, proving that the method of copying and memorizing information is effective.
Example 2
Adjust the transmitting end electromagnetic coil and the receiving end electromagnetic coil so that they are in the resonance state with the same frequency, the same waveform and opposite phase. Place the glass bottle containing clotrimazole in the transmitting end electromagnetic coil to copy and memorize the clotrimazole signal. After 3 days, remove the clotrimazole bottle and place the solid plate newly coated with a certain number of yeasts in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group. The control group is placed outside the resonance field. There are 3 cells in both the experimental group and the control group. For parallel samples, after culturing for 40 hours at room temperature (25°C), rinse all the grown colonies with sterile water to constant volume, measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600nm, and calculate the inhibition rate; continue to add a certain number of yeasts to the newly coated colonies. The solid plate experimental group is placed in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end, and the control group is placed outside the resonance field. There are 3 groups in both the experimental group and the control group. After 89 hours of culture, all the growing colonies are washed down with sterile water to a constant volume, and measured at 600 nm. The absorbance value OD600 was used to calculate the inhibition rate.
At this time, the effect of copying and memorizing has been maintained for 6 days. In order to ensure the effect of information copying and memory, the glass bottle containing clotrimazole was placed on the electromagnetic coil at the transmitter. After one day of electromagnetic resonance copying and memorizing the clotrimazole signal, Remove the clotrimazole bottle, place the solid plate newly coated with a certain amount of yeast on the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group, and place the control group outside the resonance field. Three parallel samples are set up in both the experimental group and the control group, and culture After 67 hours, rinse all the grown colonies with sterile water to constant volume, measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600 nm, and calculate the inhibition rate.
As can be seen from Figure 3, within 6 days of the coil copying and memorizing the clotrimazole signal, the two experiments had a significant inhibitory effect on yeast; the effect was still obvious after repeated copying and memorizing the clotrimazole signal, proving that the information was copied and Memorization methods work.
Example 3
Adjust the transmitting end electromagnetic coil and the receiving end electromagnetic coil so that they are in the resonance state with the same frequency, the same waveform and opposite phase. Place the glass bottle containing clotrimazole in the transmitting end electromagnetic coil to copy and memorize the clotrimazole signal. After 2 days, remove the clotrimazole bottle, and place the newly inoculated yeast liquid of a certain concentration on the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group. The control group is placed outside the resonance field. Three parallel samples are set up in both the experimental group and the control group at room temperature. After culturing for 30 hours at 25°C, measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600 nm and calculate the inhibition rate.
Continue to place the newly inoculated yeast liquid in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group. The control group is placed outside the resonance field. Three parallel samples are set up in both the experimental group and the control group. After incubation for 30 hours, the absorbance value OD600 at 600nm is measured. Calculate inhibition rate.
At this time, the effect of copying and memory has been maintained for 3 days. In order to ensure the effect of information copying and memory, the glass bottle containing clotrimazole was placed in the electromagnetic coil of the transmitter again. The electromagnetic resonance copied and memorized the clotrimazole signal for 1 day. , remove the clotrimazole bottle, place the newly inoculated yeast liquid in the electromagnetic coil at the receiving end as the experimental group, and place the control group outside the resonance field. Three parallel samples are set up in both the experimental group and the control group. After 30 hours of culture, Measure the absorbance value OD600 at 600nm and calculate the inhibition rate.
As can be seen from Figure 4, the clotrimazole signal copied and memorized by the coil has a significant inhibitory effect on yeast. The effect is still obvious after repeated copying and memory of the clotrimazole signal, proving that the method of copying and memorizing information is effective.
In summary, in the method for copying and memorizing material information provided by the present invention, after the material to be copied is placed at the transmitter for a short period of time to copy the information, it can be taken out and put back into an appropriate environment, and the memorized information can be used to act on the corresponding target, which is easy to operate. , can copy and memorize DNA, drugs and other information and then directly act on the corresponding target, effectively slowing down and reducing the probability of consumption and deterioration of the material to be copied due to temperature, light, resonance and other factors.
The above-mentioned embodiments only express several implementation modes of the present invention, and their descriptions are relatively specific and detailed, but they should not be construed as limiting the patent scope of the present invention.
It should be noted that, for those of ordinary skill in the art, several modifications and improvements can be made without departing from the concept of the present invention, and these all belong to the protection scope of the present invention.
Therefore, the scope of protection of the patent of the present invention should be determined by the appended claims.