An orbiting multi-rotor homopolar
machine employs axially parallel,
cylindrical, electrically conductive magnets arranged circumferentially
around vertical axis of central stator ring, intimately contacting and
engaging non-slip rolling between rotor magnets and stator. A bearing
rotatably...
Inventors: Vladimir Vitalievich Roschin, Sergi Mikhailovich Godin
Assignee: Energy & Propulsion Systems LLC
U.S. Classification 310/178; 310/114
International Classification H02K 3100
Citations
Patent Number Title Issue date
406068 WIRE CABLE Jul 2, 1889
645943 GUSTAF DALEXN AND ARTHUR EULTQVIST
Mar 27, 1900
3185877 DIRECT CURRENT HOMOPOLAR
GENERATOR May 25, 1965
3465187 HOMOPOLAR GENERATOR HAVING PARALLEL
POSITIONED FARADAY DISK STRUCTURES Sep 2, 1969
5241232 Homopolar motor-generator
Aug 31, 1993
5278470 Homopolar machine which acts as a direct
current (DC) high voltage generator or motor Jan 11,
1994
5977684 Rotating machine configurable as true DC
generator or motor Nov 2, 1999
6051905 Homopolar generator Apr 18,
2000
Referenced by
Patent Number Title Issue date
7459823 Resonant unipolar generator
Dec 2, 2008
FIG. 1
is a prior art diagram
of a typical homopolar generator.
FIG. 2
is a perspective,
cutaway view of the magnetized rotor and stator.
FIG. 3 is an elevational view
of the complete orbiting multi-rotor machine.
FIG. 4 is a cross sectional
view of the invention.
FIELD
OF THE INVENTION
[0003] This invention relates generally to the field of direct current
electrical motors and generators that operate without the need for
commutation and/or rectification, and more particularly to multi-rotor
homopolar machines which derive their emf (electromotive force) from
co-rotational magnets and metallic disk embodiment.
BACKGROUND
[0004] Back in 1831, Michael Faraday discovered that a cylindrical
magnet suspended by a string and touching a mercury bath at the bottom
could generate electricity while spinning along its axis if a second
electrical contact was made at the periphery of the midpoint of the
magnet. His experiment was a one-piece homopolar machine since the
magnet and conductor were joined together. Such Faraday generators have
also been called acyclic, unipolar or homopolar generators because no
commutation or alternating of the magnetic poles is necessary for this
machine in order to generate electricity.
[0005] The type of electrical output is most often direct current (DC)
unless specific means are designed to provide an interruption of radial
conduction and thus simulate alternating current (AC). Historically, DC
was championed by Thomas Edison during the early part of the 20th
century while at the same time AC was championed by Nikola Tesla and
George Westinghouse. In the future, DC will be coming back into style
with the emergence of ambient temperature superconductive cables.
Therefore, highly efficient homopolar generators will be in demand to
meet the future market demand for DC electricity.
[0006] Homopolar generators usually have a single disk or drum rotating
in a stationary magnetic field with sliding contacts. The sliding
contacts often present high resistance however. The construction and
operation of homopolar machines for electric propulsion of marine
vessels or railguns for example is already well known. Such machines
include motors and generators wherein electrical current flows through
a conductor situated in a magnetic field during rotation of the machine
rotor.
[0007] In the case of a homopolar motor, the current will develop a J*B
force perpendicular to the direction of its flow through the conductor
and that of the magnetic field. In the case of a homopolar generator, a
voltage dependent on the rotational speed, magnetic field, and radius,
is induced in a conductor moving within the magnetic field. When
current is drawn from the homopolar generator, it also develops a J*B
force for the same reason as with the motor but is referred to as back
torque or armature reaction. General reference information including
basic principles used to reduce back torque can be found in The
Homopolar Handbook by Thomas Valone (ISBN 0-9641070-1-5).
[0008] The prior art rarely includes a one-piece homopolar machines
that rotate the magnet with the disk. Even more unknown is the concept
of rolling contacts. Eliminating sliding contacts is shown in the
"Planetary Homopolar Generator," IBM Technical Disklosure Bulletin,
Vol. 17, No. 6, p. 1786-87, November, 1974, H. D. Varadarajan.
[0009] Using a conducting belt or rolling contacts to gather current
from a magnetic field flux cutting rotor, there is an annular magnetic
field through which the rotor executes a planetary motion.
[0010] The large stresses resulting from the centrifugal force of the
massive, unbalanced planetary rotor is a distinct disadvantage,
prohibiting high speed operation. Thus, only a low rate of rotation is
possible with the IBM design.
[0011] The "Direct Current Homopolar Machine" U.S. Pat. No. 5,587,618
to Hathaway demonstrates an analogous concept of relative motion
between conductive orbiting shaft and a stationary disk-shaped
magnetized armature.
[0012] However, the design is a bit cumbersome to be practical. Science
Applications International Corporation claims a conductive belt, dual
disk "Homopolar Motor-Generator" in U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,232 to Reed
that apparently reinvents the "Dynamo Electric Machine" of U.S. Pat.
No. 406,968 patented by none other than Nikola Tesla in 1889 that also
has two unipolar magnetized rotors connected by a conductive belt. The
belted dual unipolar machines solve one of the problems that plague the
field by offering two sliding contacts at the low speed surface on the
axle. However, the present invention requires only one sliding contact
on the axle. These conductive belt machines also demonstrate, in
principle, the concept of a multi-rotor, planetary design, by the
process of coordinate transformation, since relative motion is the key
to the operation of a homopolar generator. The concept of rolling
contact is demonstrated with the Dalen "Dynamo Electric Machine" U.S.
Pat. No. 645,943, where two disks are turning in opposite directions
while in contact with each other at their periphery. However, the axle
of each disk must remain fixed in place whereas each axle is in
orbiting motion in the present invention.
[0013] Homopolar machines can reversibly function as motors as well,
such as flywheels, and used as energy storage devices. First used in
transportation applications in the 1950's, flywheel powered buses were
designed to have the flywheel accelerated at every stop. Composite
rotors currently have been developed which can spin at very high
revolutions (100,000 revolutions per second); and the speed is limited
by the tensile strength of the rim of the rotor. By using a multi-rotor
design, the centrifugal forces of a large disk can be greatly reduced
and still maintain high-energy storage or production. By using magnetic
bearings, the friction on the axis of the rotor can be reduced
sufficiently so that such rotors can maintain most of the energy for
several days.
[0014] The IBM Varadarajan planetary rotor is unbalanced and has a low
rate of magnetic flux cutting due to its annular magnetic field design.
The Hathaway direct current machine has a lot of unbalanced conductive
material orbiting the central magnetized disk which limits the
rotational speed.
[0015] The conductive belt designs can be subject to oxidation and
slippage, even requiring a toothed timing belt on each axle as well.
With most disk models of homopolar generators, as opposed to drum
designs, sliding contacts are the single most important contribution of
resistance inhibiting the power output of the machine. Internal
resistance is the only limit to the output capability of a homopolar
generator and it is important to reduce all sources of internal
resistance to obtain maximum power output for a given input torque.
Rather than use high resistance carbon brushes, medium resistance
silver-graphite brushes or dangerous conductive liquids such as
mercury, low temperature solder, or sodium-potassium, there is a need
to eliminate frictional sliding contact at the high speed periphery of
the magnetized rotor completely. Furthermore, rather than maintaining
two sliding contacts which contribute friction and resistance, even in
the rolling and belted designs, there is a need to cut the number in
half to only one high current sliding contact. The present invention
satisfies both of these needs.
SUMMARY
[0016] The present invention derives direct current electricity by
co-rotating a plurality of magnets and a metallic disk. It comprises an
improved homopolar machine with dynamically balancing, axially
parallel, cylindrical, electrically conductive magnets arranged
circumferentially around the vertical axis of central stator ring. Such
a design can be referred to as distributed generation since each magnet
rotor generates only a fraction of the current that is transmitted
through the machine. Thus, the conductive bearings contacting the
center of each end of the magnet rotors may carry only one tenth or
less of the total current.
[0017] The multi-rotor orbiting homopolar also does not include sliding
contacts at each magnetized rotor rim but instead utilizes a suitable
rolling means attached separately to magnets and also to the stator
ring for intimately contacting and engaging non-slip rolling between
magnets and stator as they orbit around the stator. The magnetized
rotors maintain rotational synchronism and equal relative position to
each other with a bearing means rotatably securing the top and bottom
end of each magnet to a corresponding electrically conductive circular
endplate.
[0018] The electrical energy is extracted, or input if used as a motor,
through contacts on the conductive stator and at the machine's
electrically conductive axle located in the center of the machine while
rigidly attached to the top circular endplate that rotates with all of
the individually magnetized rotors. The only single, high current,
moving contact that is required is an electrically conductive thrust
bearing that supports the central axle. An insulating thrust bearing
meanwhile separates the axle from the center of bottom circular
endplate. The stator, which is of course stationary, accomplishes the
second contact means through a standard electrical connection with no
need for any relative motion sliding contact. The stator may be
optionally magnetized in the opposite direction to the magnetized
rotors in order to increase the coercive force or magnetic flux density.
[0019] The drawings constitute a part of this specification and include
exemplary embodiments to the invention, which may be embodied in
various forms. It is to be understood that in some instances various
aspects of the invention may be shown exaggerated or enlarged to
facilitate an understanding of the invention.
The Problem
[0020] The problem this invention solves is that it generates high
power direct current electricity without the need for commutation and
rectification, otherwise the internal resistance losses are high.
[0021] The problems with prior art devices, processes and systems can
be categorized as follows.
[0022] 1. Require commutation or rectification to generate direct
current electricity.
[0023] 2. Rely on more than one current brush which often have high
speed contact.
[0024] 3. Do not distribute magnetic field power generation by
multi-rotor orbiting magnets in homopolar machines or systems.
[0025] 4. Internal resistance losses are usually high.
[0026] 5. Neither efficient nor cost effective.
[0027] 6. Neither simple nor practical for most applications.
Prior Art
[0028] A preliminary limited prior art search was not commissioned but
the inventor is intimately familiar with the prior art. Following are
typical examples of the prior art arranged in reverse chronological
order for ready reference of the reader.
[0029] 11) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 6,051,905 issued to
Richard Clark on Apr. 18, 2000 for "Homopolar Generator"
[0030] 10) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,977,684 presented to
Ted Lin on Nov. 2, 1999 for "Rotating Machine Configurable as True DC
Generator or Motor"
[0031] 09) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,864,198 earned by
Joseph Pinkerton on Jan. 26, 1999 for "Brushless Generator"
[0032] 08) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,587,618 issued to
George Hathaway on Dec. 24, 1996 for "Direct Current Homopolar Machine"
[0033] 07) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,278,470 graced upon
Zacharias Neag on Jan. 11, 1994 for "Homopolar Machine which acts as a
Direct Current (DC) High Voltage Generator or Motor"
[0034] 06) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,241,232 honorably
given to Jay Reed on Aug. 31, 1993 for "Homopolar Motor-Generator"
[0035] 05) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 5,011,821 published in
the name of Charley McCullough on Apr. 30, 1991 for "Method and
Apparatus for Generating Electricity"
[0036] 04) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 3,465,187 issued to
Onezime Breaux on Sep. 2, 1969 for "Homopolar Generator Having Parallel
Positioned Faraday Disk Structures"
[0037] 03) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 3,185,877 presented to
Anthony Sears on May 25, 1965 for "Direct Current Homopolar Generator"
[0038] 02) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 645,943 graced upon
inventor Gustaf Dalen on Mar. 27, 1900 for "Dynamo Electric Machine"
[0039] 01) Non-Provisional Utility U.S. Pat. No. 406,968 bestowed upon
none other than Nikola Tesla himself in 1889 for "Dynamo Electric
Machine"
[0040] None of the prior art devices known to the applicant or his
attorney disclose the EXACT embodiment of this inventor that
constitutes a simple, elegant and affordable system for an orbiting
Multi-Rotor Homopolar direct current electricity generation
Objectives
[0041] Unfortunately none of the prior art devices singly or even in
combination provide for all of the objectives as established by the
inventor for this system as enumerated below.
1. It is an objective of this invention to provide devices, method and
system for generation of high power direct current electricity without
commutation and rectification.
2. The primary objective of the invention is orbiting multi-rotor
cylindrical magnets in rolling contact that eliminates friction while
generating DC electricity.
3. Another objective of the invention is to provide high efficiency,
low noise and low resistance in a high current generator.
4. Another objective of the invention is that it uses readily available
materials in a dynamically balanced arrangement.
5. Another objective of the invention is safety through reduced
internal stress than comparable homopolar machines with a single rotor.
6. Another objective of the invention is that it provides distributed
generation around an air core.
7. Another objective of this invention is to provide an easy, quick,
simple practical way to generate more efficient and cost effective
direct current electricity.
8. Another objective of this invention is that it promote and encourage
other inventors to do additional research in homopolar machines
generally but co-rotational magnets and disk embodiments in particular.
9. Another objective of this invention is to provide a system that is
integrated and flexible.
10. Another objective of this invention is to provide a system that is
easily useable and requires little if any training for manufacturing
and use.
11. Another objective of this invention is that it meet all federal,
state, local and other private standards guidelines, regulations and
recommendations with respect to safety, environment, and energy
consumption.
12. Another objective of this invention is that it can be made from
modular standard materials and components that are also easily
maintainable.
[0054] Other objectives advantages and features of this invention
reside in its simplicity, elegance of design, ease of manufacture,
service and use and even aesthetics as will become apparent from the
following brief
description of the drawings and the detailed description of the best
mode preferred embodiments taken in connection with the accompanying
drawings.
BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a prior art diagram
of a typical homopolar generator.
FIG. 2 is a perspective,
cutaway view of the magnetized rotor and stator.
FIG. 3 is an elevational view
of the complete orbiting multi-rotor machine.
FIG. 4 is a cross sectional
view of the invention.
FIG. 5 is a plan view from the
top of the invention.
DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE BEST MODE
PREFERRED EMBODIMENT
[0060] As shown in the drawings wherein like numerals represent like
parts throughout the several views, there is generally disclosed in
FIG. 1 is a state of the prior art.
[0061] Detailed descriptions of the preferred embodiment are provided
herein. It is to be understood, however, that the present invention may
be embodied in various forms. Therefore, specific details disclosed
herein are not to be interpreted as limiting, but rather as a basis for
the claims and as a representative basis for teaching one skilled in
the art to employ the present invention in virtually any appropriately
detailed system, structure or manner.
[0062] Turning first to FIG. 2 there is shown a perspective cutaway
view of a portion of one embodiment of the present invention showing
one of a multitude of rotors that are axially magnetized (B). This
multitude mounted in parallel comprise the multi-rotor homopolar
machine in close contact with a ring shaped stator that may be
optionally magnetized in the direction opposite to the magnetic fields
of the rotors.
[0063] Each rotor 20 has its own axle 21 which is circumferentially
mounted vertically, arranged and dynamically balanced around a central
vertical axis, on an electrically conductive but low permeability axle
rod 21 made of copper, brass or bronze, that may penetrate the center
of the entire magnetized rotor and rotatably attach to top and bottom
bearing 33 on circular endplates 31, 32 shown in FIG. 3. In operation,
the rotors orbit around the circular stator ring, which may or may not
also be magnetized.
[0064] The invention is more completely shown in the elevational view
of FIG. 3 with several rotors 20 rotatably attached to the top circular
endplate 31 and bottom circular endplate 32 by electrically conductive
bearings 33. The top endplate 31 is rigidly attached to the central
axle 34 supporting the orbiting multi-rotor homopolar generator
assembly. The hollow circular design of the stationary ring stator 23
is also visible in FIG. 3, which can be optionally magnetized to
increase performance output.
[0065] The bottom circular endplate 32 has a large hole in the center,
more completely seen in FIG. 4, that allows inner attachment to
insulating bearing 44 which optimally can be a non-contacting, low
friction magnetic bearing since the weight of the rotor assembly is
carried by the electrically conductive thrust bearing 41. The bottom
endplate 32 is thus isolated electrically from the stationary Inner
cylinder 43 that is the inner core of the stator. Inner circular
assembly plates 49 of equal size and shape, that preferably are
electrically conductive, rigidly attach the inner cylinder 43 to the
stator ring 23. In accordance with the present invention, FIG. 4 shows
the side cross sectional view edge on with a cutaway so that the
central axle 34 and hollow inner cylinder design 43 is visible.
[0066] The insulating bearings 42 separate the central axle 34 from the
inner cylinder 43. Both bearings 42 and 44 electrically maintain the
separation of polarity of the electromotive force (emf) voltage of each
rotor. The positive or negative polarity of the conductors depends of
course on the rotation direction of the rotor magnets. One conductor 45
is electrically emerging from the stator assembly and ultimately
emanates from the outer edge of each rotor 20 with the homopolar effect
conducting the generated electricity through the rolling means 47 and
48. The opposite polarity conductor 46 is electrically emanating from
the center axle 21 of each rotor 20 is connected to the electrically
conductive thrust bearing 41.
[0067] In accordance with an important function of the present
invention, there is shown in FIG. 4 one embodiment of an intimately
contacting and engaging nonslip rolling means 47 and 48. As is
well-known in the industry where good traction with a high coefficient
of friction (1.6 or better) but sufficiently low electrical resistance
is desired between two surfaces, an adherent coating of copper can be
used on both facing surfaces of the stator 23 and rotor 20. For the
copper coating, electro-deposition can be used or flame spraying of
copper on the rotor and stator outer surfaces.
[0068] Another embodiment of rolling means 47 and 48 utilizes a geared
electromechanical rotary joint developed by NASA Goddard Space Center
(NASA Tech Briefs, December, 1994) which offers the advantage of a
springy, low noise planetary gear contacting a stator ring gear. It was
designed by NASA to overcome the disadvantages of sliding contacts and
to ensure high traction desired for rolling electrical contacts.
[0069] The springy gears are made from beryllium copper which is a
self-cleaning material with, in one embodiment, an average diameter of
6.35 mm with any reasonable number of teeth. Another concept to
creating a rolling contact utilizes a magnetic sprocket design with
small rare earth (samarium cobalt for example) magnets embedded
perpendicularly in the surfaces of the stator ring and rotor magnets.
The magnetic sprocket thus utilizes equally spaced magnets mounted
normal to the axes of the stator and rotor.
[0070] To demonstrate an important feature of the invention, there is
shown in FIG. 5 a plan view from the top of the balanced distribution
of the rotors 20 around the stator assembly 43 with the outer stator
ring 23 that are equally spaced and preferably dynamically balanced so
the centrifugal forces are equal and opposite.
Theory of Operation
[0072] The main principle of operation is based on the fact that
rotating cylindrical magnets creates a homopolar emf generation from
Faraday's Law and the Lorentz Force. Physically, a rotating,
non-inertial reference frame configuration can only be analyzed
correctly with Einstein's general theory of relativity, utilizing a
Thirring metric.
[0073] Particularly, where rotating cylindrical magnets and disk are
synchronized and made co-rotational, such a co-rotational configuration
makes the generator one piece like the earth's magnetic field itself.
As the inventors explored this correspondence more closely, it was
learned that the earth's molten, electrically conductive iron core also
includes not one but several vortices in a coaxial circular
arrangement. The inventors stumbled upon this concept while
investigating the field rotation paradox and found that an orbiting,
multi-rotor homopolar generator assembly would be analogous to the
earth's electrically conductive, multi-vortex, magnetic, molten iron
core.
[0074] The field rotation paradox can be easily resolved by an amateur
DIY (Do It Yourself ) scientist by comparing the interception of a
linear magnetic field vs. a rotating magnetic field. In the former
configuration the meter gives the same reading whether the magnet is
moved with respect to a pickup coil of wire or vice versa but in the
latter configuration the meter reading is seen only when the disk is
moved with respect to rotary magnetic field of cylindrical magnet but
not when the magnet is moved with respect to the disk. The former is
consistent with special relativity while the latter is relying on
general relativity. Both are loosely termed "relativistic."
Assembly and Use
[0076] The manufacturing, assembly and use of this invention is very
simple even intuitive. The system of this invention can be readily
assembled from the teaching provided in this disclosure by state of the
art techniques and materials by a person of average skill in the art.
[0077] The applicant has described the essence of this invention. While
this invention has been described with reference to an illustrative
embodiment, this description is not intended to be construed in a
limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations of the
illustrative embodiments as well as other embodiments of the invention
will be apparent to a person of average skill in the art upon reference
to this description.
Variations
[0079] Due to the simplicity and elegance of the design of this
invention designing around it is very difficult if not impossible.
Nonetheless many changes may be made to this design without deviating
from the spirit of this invention. Examples of such contemplated
variations include the following:
1. The shape and size, colors etc of the device or the packaging
thereof may be modified.
2. Additional complimentary and complementary functions and features
may be added.
3. The system of this invention may be adapted for other related uses.
4. Instead of cylindrical magnets, other types of magnets and mode of
mounting on the disk may be employed to create the orbiting, rotational
magnetic field.
5. The invention may be scaled up and down by several orders of
magnitude
7. An experimental science toy version may be developed for education
and entertainment of little young scientists of the future.
8. Homopolar generator may be employed in reverse as a motor to convert
electrical energy into mechanical energy.
9. A homopolar servo motor version may be crafted based on this
co-rotational magnet and disk concept.
10. Permanent cylindrical magnets may be replaced by equivalent
configuration of electromagnets.
11. A portion of the emf generated may be fed back to cylindrical
electromagnets to explore the possibility of a self-excited generator
without violating any laws of nature.
[0090] Other changes such as aesthetics and substitution of newer
materials as they become available, which substantially perform the
same function in substantially the same manner with substantially the
same result without deviating from the spirit of the invention may be
made.
[0091] Following is a listing of the components used in the best mode
preferred embodiment and the alternate embodiments for use with OEM as
well as retrofit markets. For the ready reference of the reader the
reference numerals have been arranged in ascending numerical order.
[0092] 10=Prior art generally
[0093] 20=Rotor(s)
[0094] 21=Axle, rod
[0095] 23=Stationary Ring Stator (Optionally Magnetized)
[0096] 31=Top circular end plate
[0097] 32=Bottom circular end plate
[0098] 33=Bearing
[0099] 34=Central Axle
[0100] 41=Electrically Conductive Thrust Bearing
[0101] 42=Insulating Bearing
[0102] 43=Stationary Hollow Inner Cylinder
[0103] 44=Insulating Bearing
[0104] 45=Opposite Polarity Conductor
[0105] 46=Opposite Polarity Conductor
[0106] 47=Non-Slip Rolling Means
[0107] 48=Non-Slip Rolling Means
[0108] 49=Inner Circular Assembly Plates
Definitions and Acronyms
[0110] A great care has been taken to use words with their conventional
dictionary definitions. Following definitions are included here for
clarification.
[0111] 3D=Three Dimensional
[0112] Acyclic=Non-cyclic, non rotational or linear
[0113] DC=Direct Current as contrasted from alternating current
electricity
[0114] DIY=Do It Yourself
[0115] DYNAMO=A device for converting mechanical energy into electrical
energy (& Vice versa)
[0116] EMF=Electromagnetic Force
[0117] Homopolar=Same as unipolar
[0118] Integrated=Combination of two entities to act like one
[0119] Interface=Junction between two dissimilar entities
[0120] N=Magnetic North (Permanent or electro-magnet)
[0121] N-Machine=One Piece Faraday generator
[0122] OEM=Original Equipment Manufacturer
[0123] S=Magnetic South (Permanent or electro-magnet)
[0124] Unipolar=Same as homopolar
[0125] Note: It should be noted that the prior art uses unipolar,
homopolar, acyclic and Faraday Disk Dynamo interchangeably.
[0126] While this invention has been described with reference to
illustrative embodiments, this description is not intended to be
construed in a limiting sense. Various modifications and combinations
of the illustrative embodiments as well as other embodiments of the
invention will be apparent to a person of average skill in the art upon
reference to this description. It is therefore contemplated that the
appended claim(s) cover any such modifications, embodiments as fall
within the true scope of this invention as defined by the appended
claims.