rexresearch.com
Alexander
RICKARD, et al.
L-Arginine vs Plaque
http://ns.umich.edu/new/releases/22876-naturally-occurring-amino-acid-could-improve-oral-health
May 06, 2015
Naturally
occurring amino acid could improve oral health
ANN ARBOR — Arginine, a common amino acid found naturally in
foods, breaks down dental plaque, which could help millions of
people avoid cavities and gum disease, researchers at the
University of Michigan and Newcastle University have discovered.
Alexander Rickard, assistant professor of epidemiology at the
U-M School of Public Health, and colleagues, discovered that in
the lab L-arginine—found in red meat, poultry, fish and dairy
products, and is already used in dental products for tooth
sensitivity—stopped the formation of dental plaque.
"This is important as bacteria like to aggregate on surfaces to
form biofilms. Dental plaque is a biofilm," Rickard said.
"Biofilms account for more than 50 percent of all hospital
infections. Dental plaque biofilms contribute to the billions of
dollars of dental treatments and office visits every year in the
United States."
Biofilm
grown in unsupplemented saliva.

Biofilm
grown in saliva supplemented with 500 mM L-arginine.

Dental biofilms are the culprits in the formation of dental
caries (cavities), gingivitis and periodontal disease. Surveys
indicate that nearly 24 percent of adults in the United States
have untreated dental caries, and about 39 percent have
moderate-to-severe periodontitis, a number that rises to 64
percent for those over age 65.
Most methods for dental plaque control involve use of
antimicrobial agents, such as chlorhexidine, which are chemicals
aimed at killing plaque bacteria, but they can affect sense of
taste and stain teeth. Antimicrobial treatments have been the
subject of debate about overuse in recent years.
Pending further clinical trials to verify their lab findings,
the researchers said L-arginine could take the place of the
current plaque-controlling biocide substances including
chlorhexidine and other antimicrobials.
"At present, around 10-to-15 percent of adults in the Western
world have advanced periodontitis, which can lead to loose teeth
and even the loss of teeth. Therefore, there is a clear need for
better methods to control dental plaque," said Nick Jakubovics,
a lecturer at Newcastle University's School of Dental Sciences.
Their findings are reported in the current issue of PLOS ONE.
The mechanism for how L-arginine causes the disintegration of
the biofilms needs further study, the researchers said. It
appears arginine can change how cells stick together, and can
trigger bacteria within biofilms to alter how they behave so
that they no longer stick to surfaces, they said.
In conducting their research, team members used a model system
they introduced in 2013 that mimics the oral cavity. The
researchers were able to grow together the numerous bacterial
species found in dental plaque in the laboratory, using natural
human saliva.
"Other laboratory model systems use one or a small panel of
species," Rickard said. "Dental plaque biofilms can contain tens
to hundreds of species, hence our model better mimics what
occurs in the mouth, giving us great research insight."
Other researchers include Ethan Kolderman, Deepti Bettampadi,
Derek Samarian and Betsy Foxman of U-M and Scot Dowd of
Molecular Research LP.
http://journals.plos.org/plosone/article?id=10.1371/journal.pone.0121835
PLOS x ( May 6, 2015 )
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0121835
L-Arginine
Destabilizes Oral Multi-Species Biofilm Communities
Developed in Human Saliva
Ethan
Kolderman, Deepti Bettampadi, Derek Samarian, Scot E. Dowd,
Betsy Foxman, Nicholas S. Jakubovics, Alexander H. Rickard
Abstract
The amino acid L-arginine inhibits bacterial coaggregation, is
involved in cell-cell signaling, and alters bacterial metabolism
in a broad range of species present in the human oral cavity.
Given the range of effects of L-arginine on bacteria, we
hypothesized that L-arginine might alter multi-species oral
biofilm development and cause developed multi-species biofilms
to disassemble. Because of these potential biofilm-destabilizing
effects, we also hypothesized that L-arginine might enhance the
efficacy of antimicrobials that normally cannot rapidly
penetrate biofilms. A static microplate biofilm system and a
controlled-flow microfluidic system were used to develop
multi-species oral biofilms derived from pooled unfiltered
cell-containing saliva (CCS) in pooled filter-sterilized
cell-free saliva (CFS) at 37oC. The addition of pH neutral
L-arginine monohydrochloride (LAHCl) to CFS was found to exert
negligible antimicrobial effects but significantly altered
biofilm architecture in a concentration-dependent manner. Under
controlled flow, the biovolume of biofilms (µm3/µm2) developed
in saliva containing 100-500 mM LAHCl were up to two orders of
magnitude less than when developed without LAHCI.
Culture-independent community analysis demonstrated that 500 mM
LAHCl substantially altered biofilm species composition: the
proportion of Streptococcus and Veillonella species increased
and the proportion of Gram-negative bacteria such as Neisseria
and Aggregatibacter species was reduced. Adding LAHCl to
pre-formed biofilms also reduced biovolume, presumably by
altering cell-cell interactions and causing cell detachment.
Furthermore, supplementing 0.01% cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC),
an antimicrobial commonly used for the treatment of dental
plaque, with 500 mM LAHCl resulted in greater penetration of CPC
into the biofilms and significantly greater killing compared to
a non-supplemented 0.01% CPC solution. Collectively, this work
demonstrates that LAHCl moderates multi-species oral biofilm
development and community composition and enhances the activity
of CPC. The incorporation of LAHCl into oral healthcare products
may be useful for enhanced biofilm control.
Patents
: Arginine vs Plaque
WO2015048146
COMPOSITIONS
AND METHOD FOR DESTABILIZING, ALTERING, AND DISPERSING
BIOFILMS
Inventor: RICKARD ALEXANDER, et al.
The present disclosure relates to compositions and methods for
destabilizing biofilms, altering biofilm 3D structure, and
dispersing biofilms, in order to enhance biofilm cell removal
and/or sensitivity to other agents (e.g., environmental or
co-applied treatments). In particular, the present disclosure
relates to the use of L-arginine in the removal and/or
sensitization (e.g., to antimicrobials) of microorganisms in
medical, industrial, domestic, or environmental applications, as
well as treatment of bacterial infections (e.g., in biofilms).
BACKGROUND
OF THE INVENTION
A biofilm is a well-organized community of microorganisms that
adheres to surfaces and is embedded in slimy extracellular
polymeric substances (EPSs). EPS is a complex mixture of
high-molecular-mass polymers (> 10,000 Da) generated by the
bacterial cells, cell lysis and hydrolysis products, and organic
matter adsorbed from the substrate. EPSs are involved in the
establishment of stable arrangements of microorganisms in
biofilms
(Wolfaardt et al. (1998) Microb. Ecol. 35:213-223; herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety), and extracellular DN
A (eDNA) is one of the major components of EPSs (Flemming et al.
(2001) Water Sci. Technol. 43:9-16; Spoering et al. (2006) Curr.
Opin. Microbiol. 9: 133-137; each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Bacteria living in a biofilm usually
have significantly different properties from free-floating
(planktonic) bacteria of the same species, as the dense and
protected environment of the film allows them to cooperate and
interact in various ways. One benefit of this environment is
increased resistance to detergents and antibiotics, as the dense
extracellular matrix and the outer layer of cells protect the
interior of the community. In some cases antibiotic resistance
can be increased a thousand-fold (Stewart et al. (2001) Lancet
358: 135-138; herein incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Biofilms can be formed in various bacterial species (e.g.,
Acinetobacter sp. (e.g., A. baylyi, A. baumannii),
Staphylococcus aureus, Stenotrophomonas maltophilia, Escherichia
coli (e.g., E. coli K-12). The formation of biofilms by such
species is a major determinant of medical outcome during the
course of colonization or infection. For example, Acinetobacter
spp. frequently colonize patients in clinical settings through
formation of biofilms on ventilator tubing, on skin and wound
sites, medical tubing, and the like, and are a common cause of
nosocomial pneumonia.
As biofilms are complex structures formed of various elements,
their removal or disruption traditionally requires the use of
dispersants, surfactants, detergents, enzyme formulations,
antibiotics, biocides, boil-out procedures, corrosive chemicals,
mechanical cleaning, use of antimicrobial agents, inhibiting
microbial attachment, inhibiting biofilm growth by removing
essential nutrients and promoting biomass detachment and
degradation of biofilm matrix (Chen XS, P.S.: Biofilm removal
caused by chemical treatments. Water Res 2000;34:4229-4233;
herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). However, such
classical removal or disruption methods are not efficacious or
feasible in all situations where biofilm formation is
undesirable.
Additional methods for undesirable bacteria in biofilms are
needed.
SUMMARY OF
THE INVENTION
The present disclosure relates to compositions and methods for
destabilizing biofilms, altering biofilm 3D structure, and
dispersing biofilms, in order to enhance biofilm cell removal
and/or sensitivity to other agents (e.g., environmental or
co-applied treatments). In particular, the present disclosure
relates to the use of L-arginine in the removal and/or
sensitization (e.g., to antimicrobials) of microorganisms in
medical, industrial, domestic, or environmental applications, as
well as treatment of bacterial infections (e.g., in biofilms).
Embodiments of the present invention provide compositions (e.g.,
pharmaceutical, commercial, health care, etc.), systems, uses,
and methods that result in one or more of: inducing cell-damage,
killing cells, disrupting intra-cellular processes leading to
deregulation/loss of homeostasis, disrupting cell-cell adhesion,
inducing three dimensional rearrangement of architecture,
disrupting cell-cell signaling, disrupting cell-cell metabolic
interactions, disrupting adhesion to surfaces, reducing the
pathogenic potential of biofilms, reducing biofilm mass,
decreasing the proportion of pathogenic bacteria in a biofilm,
increasing the proportion of beneficial bacteria in a biofilm,
or preventing growth of a microorganism in a biofilm,
comprising: contacting bacteria in a biofilm with cell-free L-
arginine at a concentration of at least 1 mM, wherein the
contacting kills or inhibits the growth of microorganisms and/or
alters the 3D arrangement of the cells in the biofilm, which can
damage bacteria by preventing them from interacting with others
and/or exposing them to deleterious environmental effects. In
some embodiments, the microorganism is a bacterium. In some
embodiments, the bacteria are in a coaggregate. In some
embodiments, the biofilm is a dental biofilm. In some
embodiments, the bacteria are in a coaggregate or biofilm with a
plurality of different bacterial species (e.g., of Streptococcus
and Actinomyces, such as, for example, S. gordonii and A. oris).
In some embodiments, the L-arginine prevents coaggregation or
promotes de-adhesion/dispersion of said bacteria. In some
embodiments, the L-arginine is present at a concentration of at
least 1 mM (e.g., at least 10 mM, at least 50 mM, at least 100
mM, 200 mM, at least 250 mM, at least 300 mM, at least 350 mM,
at least 400 mM, at least 450 mM, at least 500 mM, at least 600
mM, at least 700 mM, at least 800 mM, at least 900 mM, or at
least 1 M). In some embodiments, the bacteria are in multi-
species oral biofilms (e.g., dental plaque in saliva). In some
embodiments, L-arginine disrupts biofilms grown in saliva
without antimicrobial activity. In some embodiments, the method
further comprises contacting the bacteria with cetylpyridinium
chloride (CPC).
Additional embodiments comprise the use of a composition
comprising L-arginine at a concentration of at least 1 mM to
induce one or more of: inducing microbial cell-damage, killing
cells, disrupting intra-cellular processes leading to
deregulation/loss of homeostasis, disrupting cell-cell adhesion,
inducing three dimensional rearrangement of architecture,
disrupting cell-cell signaling, disrupting cell-cell metabolic
interactions, disrupting adhesion to surfaces, reducing the
pathogenic potential of biofilms, reducing biofilm mass,
decreasing the proportion of pathogenic bacteria in a biofilm,
increasing the proportion of beneficial bacteria in a biofilm,
or preventing growth of a microorganism in a biofilm. In some
embodiments, the composition further comprises at
cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC).
Further embodiments provide a plasmid that reports expression or
concentration of a component of a biofilm or planktonic cell
population, where the plasmid comprises either a first marker
under the control of a constitutive promoter or a second marker
under the control of a promoter induced by the component. In
some embodiments, the marker is a fluorescent marker (e.g., GFP
or Mcherry). In some embodiments, the first promoter is a
streptococcal ribosomal promoter (e.g., a S. gordonii DL1 50S
ribosomal protein (SGO l 192) promoter). In some embodiments,
the second promoter is S. gordonii catabolite control protein A
(SGO 0773), or S. gordonii argC or arcA promoter.
Additional embodiments provide a streptococcal cell (e.g., S.
gordonii) comprising the plasmid. In some embodiments, the cell
is in a biofilm.
Some embodiments provide methods and uses of monitoring
concentration of a component (e.g., arginine or AI-2) of a
biofilm or planktonic cell culture, comprising: a) contacting a
streptococcal cell with the plasmid described herein; and b)
measuring the level of the marker. In some embodiments, the
level of expression of the marker is correlated to the level of
the component. In some embodiments, the method further comprises
the step of contacting the cell with a test compound (e.g. a
drug that kills or inhibits or is suspected of killing or
inhibiting the growth of the cell).
Additional embodiments are described herein.
DESCRIPTION
OF THE FIGURES
Figure 1
shows the role of arginine in dental plaque growth. High and
low concentrations of L-arginine cause biofilm destabilization
and results in many cells to disperse/de-adhere from the
biofilm leaving behind dead/damage unresponsive cells.
Figure 2 shows
regulation of S. gordonii argC and arcA gene expression in
response to rapid changes in exogenous L-arginine. (A) S.
gordonii cells were cultured in high (5 mM) arginine and
switched to no arginine at time = 0 min on x-axis. (B) S.
gordonii was cultured in intermediate (0.5 mM) arginine to
late exponential phase, when excess (50 mM) arginine was added
(time = 0 min).

Figure 3 shows S. gordonii bio films in saliva with or
without 0.5 mM or 0.5 M (500 mM) arginine (Arg).
Figure 4 shows disruption of arcR reduces biofilm
formation by S. gordonii.
Figure 5 shows the effect of L-arginine on species
composition of saliva derived community developed in pooled
filter sterilized saliva. (A) Showing the increase in
bacterial diversity (operational taxonomic units, OTU) caused
by prolonged exposure of oral multi- species biofilms to 500mM
L-arginine. Black-colored bars represent data derived from the
analysis of biofilms developed in flowing non-supplemented
saliva while the grey-colored bars represent data derived from
the analysis of biofilms developed in 500 mM supplemented
saliva. (B) Showing changes in phyla (color coding as before).
(C) Showing changes in composition of genera (key is from left
to right in order from bottom to top in bar; Neisseria,
Granulicatella, Streptococcus, etc).
Figure 6 shows the effect of growing multi-species
biofilms in increasing concentrations of L-arginine under
static conditions. Representative 3D renderings of 20 h- old
oral biofilms grown from a cell-containing saliva (CCS)
inoculum in the static biofilm system containing cell free
saliva (CFS) supplemented with different concentrations of L-
arginine monohydrochloride (LAHC1). Upper renderings (Ai-Hi)
are of the x-y plane.
Middle renderings (?2-?2) are of the x-z plane. Lower
renderings (A3-H3) represent an angled view (x-y-z). Bars
represent 50 µ??. Associated table shows changes in mean
percentage cell viability.
Figure 7 shows that L-arginine destabilizes the
architecture of multi-species oral biofilms grown in saliva
under flowing conditions in a microfluidics channel.
Representative 3D renderings and biofilm characteristics
derived from computational image analysis of oral biofilms
developed for 20 h in different concentrations of L-arginine
monohydrochloride (LAHC1) in the Bio flux™ flowing saliva
biofilm system.
Figure 8 shows that 500mM L-arginine destabilizes
preformed multi-species oral biofilms of differing
developmental age.
Figure 9 shows that L-arginine destabilizes pre-formed
multi-species oral biofilm communities and in doing so can
enhance the penetration of CPC (0.01 or 0.05%). Specifically,
this figure shows that 500mM L-arginine enhances the
penetration and killing of CPC so that less CPC is required as
compared to when used in the absence of L-arginine.
Figure 10 shows fold induction of bio luminescence by
Vibrio harveyi BB170 which is responsive to AI-2. AI-2 is
shown to be produced in increasing amounts as L-arginine
concentration increases. The AI-2 data are normalized to the
"control" (non-supplemented saliva).
Figure 11 shows that application of L-arginine but not
D-arginine destabizes and prevents growth of bacterial
communities.
Figure 12 shows (A) modifiable plasmid (pPElOlO) to allow
the generation of fluorescent Streptococcus gordonii DL1 (GFP
or Mcherry) and (B) an example of two promoter that allow the
evaluation of the differential expression of GFP fluorescence
in S. gordonii DL1 biofilms in response to exogenous ly added
AI-2.
DEFINITIONS
To facilitate an understanding of the present invention, a
number of terms and phrases are defined below:
As used herein the term "biofilm" refers to any
three-dimensional, (e.g., matrix- encased) microbial community
displaying multicellular characteristics. Accordingly, as used
herein, the term biofilm includes surface-associated biofilms as
well as biofilms in suspension, such as floes and granules.
Biofilms may comprise a single microbial species or may be mixed
species complexes, and may include bacteria as well as fungi,
algae, protozoa, or other microorganisms. In some embodiments,
biofilms comprise coaggregating organisms. In some embodiments,
biofilms comprise a single organism or multiple organisms that
do not coaggregate.
As used herein, the term "host cell" refers to any eukaryotic or
prokaryotic cell (e.g., bacterial cells such as E. coli, yeast
cells, mammalian cells, avian cells, amphibian cells, plant
cells, fish cells, and insect cells), whether located in vitro
or in vivo. For example, host cells may be located in a
transgenic animal.
As used herein, the term "prokaryotes" refers to a group of
organisms that usually lack a cell nucleus or any other
membrane-bound organelles. In some embodiments, prokaryotes are
bacteria. The term "prokaryote" includes both archaea and
eubacteria.
As used herein, the term "subject" refers to individuals {e.g.,
human, animal, or other organism) to be treated by the methods
or compositions of the present invention. Subjects include, but
are not limited to, mammals {e.g., murines, simians, equines,
bovines, porcines, canines, felines, and the like), and most
preferably includes humans. In the context of the invention, the
term "subject" generally refers to an individual who will
receive or who has received treatment for a condition
characterized by the presence of bio film-forming bacteria, or
in anticipation of possible exposure to biofilm-forming
bacteria.
As used herein the term, "in vitro" refers to an artificial
environment and to processes or reactions that occur within an
artificial environment. In vitro environments include, but are
not limited to, test tubes and cell cultures. The term "in vivo"
refers to the natural environment {e.g. , an animal or a cell)
and to processes or reaction that occur within a natural
environment.
As used herein, the term "virulence" refers to the degree of
pathogenicity of a microorganism (e.g., bacteria or fungus),
e.g., as indicated by the severity of the disease produced or
its ability to invade the tissues of a subject. It is generally
measured experimentally by the median lethal dose (LD50) or
median infective dose (ID50). The term may also be used to refer
to the competence of any infectious agent to produce pathologic
effects.
As used herein, the term "effective amount" refers to the amount
of a composition (e.g., a composition comprising L-arginine)
sufficient to effect beneficial or desired results. An effective
amount can be administered in one or more administrations,
applications or dosages and is not intended to be limited to a
particular formulation or administration route. In some
embodiments, the effective amount is at least 1 mM (e.g., 10 mM,
50 mM, 100 mM, 200 mM, 300 mM, 400 mM, 500 mM, 750 mM, 1000 mM
or more).
As used herein, the term "administration" refers to the act of
giving a drug, prodrug, or other agent, or therapeutic treatment
(e.g., compositions comprising L-arginine) to a physiological
system (e.g., a subject or in vivo, in vitro, or ex vivo cells,
tissues, and organs). Exemplary routes of administration to the
human body can be through the eyes (ophthalmic), mouth (oral),
skin (transdermal), nose (nasal), lungs (inhalant), oral mucosa
(buccal), ear, by injection (e.g., intravenously,
subcutaneously, intratumorally, intraperitoneally, etc.),
topical administration and the like.
As used herein, the term "treating a surface" refers to the act
of exposing a surface to one or more compositions comprising
L-arginine. Methods of treating a surface include, but are not
limited to, spraying, misting, submerging, and coating.
As used herein, the term "co -administration" refers to the
administration of at least two agent(s) (e.g. , L-arginine in
combination with an antimicrobial agent) or therapies to a
subject. In some embodiments, the co-administration of two or
more agents or therapies is concurrent. In other embodiments, a
first agent/therapy is administered prior to a second
agent/therapy. Those of skill in the art understand that the
formulations and/or routes of administration of the various
agents or therapies used may vary. The appropriate dosage for
co-administration can be readily determined by one skilled in
the art. In some embodiments, when agents or therapies are co
-administered, the respective agents or therapies are
administered at lower dosages than appropriate for their
administration alone. Thus, coadministration is especially
desirable in embodiments where the co-administration of the
agents or therapies lowers the requisite dosage of a potentially
harmful (e.g., toxic) agent(s).
As used herein, the term "wound" refers broadly to injuries to
tissue including the skin, subcutaneous tissue, muscle, bone,
and other structures initiated in different ways, for example,
surgery, (e.g., open post cancer resection wounds, including but
not limited to, removal of melanoma and breast cancer etc.),
contained post-operative surgical wounds, pressure sores (e.g.,
from extended bed rest) and wounds induced by trauma. As used
herein, the term "wound" is used without limitation to the cause
of the wound, be it a physical cause such as bodily positioning
as in bed sores or impact as with trauma or a biological cause
such as disease process, aging process, obstetric process, or
any other manner of biological process. Wounds caused by
pressure may also be classified into one of four grades
depending on the depth of the wound: i) Grade I: wounds limited
to the epidermis; ii) Grade II: wounds extending into the
dermis; iii) Grade III: wounds extending into the subcutaneous
tissue; and iv) Grade IV: wounds wherein bones are exposed
(e.g., a bony pressure point such as the greater trochanter or
the sacrum). The term "partial thickness wound" refers to wounds
that are limited to the epidermis and dermis; a wound of any
etiology may be partial thickness. The term "full thickness
wound" is meant to include wounds that extend through the
dermis.
As used herein, "wound site" refers broadly to the anatomical
location of a wound, without limitation.
As used herein, the term "dressing" refers broadly to any
material applied to a wound for protection, absorbance,
drainage, treatment, etc. Numerous types of dressings are
commercially available, including films (e.g., polyurethane
films), hydrocoUoids (hydrophilic colloidal particles bound to
polyurethane foam), hydrogels (cross-linked polymers containing
about at least 60% water), foams (hydrophilic or hydrophobic),
calcium alginates (nonwoven composites of fibers from calcium
alginate), and cellophane (cellulose with a plasticizer) (Kannon
and Garrett (1995) Dermatol. Surg. 21 : 583-590; Davies (1983)
Burns 10: 94; each herein incorporated by reference). The
present invention also contemplates the use of dressings
impregnated with pharmacological compounds (e.g., antibiotics,
antiseptics, thrombin, analgesic compounds, etc). Cellular wound
dressings include commercially available materials such as
Apligraf®, Dermagraft®, Biobrane®, TransCyte®, Integra® Dermal
Regeneration Template®, and OrCell®.
As used herein, the term "toxic" refers to any detrimental or
harmful effects on a subject, a cell, or a tissue as compared to
the same cell or tissue prior to the administration of the
toxicant.
As used herein, the term "pharmaceutical composition" refers to
the combination of an active agent {e.g., L-arginine) with a
carrier, inert or active, making the composition especially
suitable for diagnostic or therapeutic use in vitro, in vivo or
ex vivo. The terms "pharmaceutically acceptable" or
"pharmacologically acceptable," as used herein, refer to
compositions that do not substantially produce adverse
reactions, e.g., toxic, allergic, or immunological reactions,
when administered to a subject.
As used herein, the term "topically" refers to application of
the compositions of the present invention to the surface of the
skin and mucosal cells and tissues {e.g., alveolar, buccal,
lingual, masticatory, or nasal mucosa, and other tissues and
cells which line hollow organs or body cavities).
As used herein, the term "pharmaceutically acceptable carrier"
refers to any of the standard pharmaceutical carriers including,
but not limited to, phosphate buffered saline solution, water,
emulsions {e.g., such as an oil/water or water/oil emulsions),
and various types of wetting agents, any and all solvents,
dispersion media, coatings, sodium lauryl sulfate, isotonic and
absorption delaying agents, disintrigrants {e.g., potato starch
or sodium starch glycolate), and the like. The compositions also
can include stabilizers and
preservatives. For examples of carriers, stabilizers, and
adjuvants. (See e.g., Martin, Remington's Pharmaceutical
Sciences, 15th Ed., Mack Publ. Co., Easton, Pa. (1975),
incorporated herein by reference). In certain embodiments, the
compositions of the present invention may be formulated for
veterinary, horticultural or agricultural use. Such formulations
include dips, sprays, seed dressings, stem injections, sprays,
and mists. In certain embodiments, compositions of the present
invention may be used in any application where it is desirable
to alter (e.g., inhibit) the formation of biofilms, e.g., food
industry applications; consumer goods (e.g., medical goods,
goods intended for consumers with impaired or developing immune
systems (e.g., infants, children, elderly, consumers suffering
from disease or at risk from disease), and the like.
As used herein, the term "medical devices" includes any material
or device that is used on, in, or through a subject's or
patient's body, for example, in the course of medical treatment
{e.g., for a disease or injury). Medical devices include, but
are not limited to, such items as medical implants, wound care
devices, drug delivery devices, and body cavity and personal
protection devices. The medical implants include, but are not
limited to, urinary catheters, intravascular catheters, dialysis
shunts, wound drain tubes, skin sutures, vascular grafts,
implantable meshes, intraocular devices, heart valves, and the
like. Wound care devices include, but are not limited to,
general wound dressings, biologic graft materials, tape closures
and dressings, and surgical incise drapes. Drug delivery devices
include, but are not limited to, needles, drug delivery skin
patches, drug delivery mucosal patches and medical sponges. Body
cavity and personal protection devices, include, but are not
limited to, tampons, sponges, surgical and examination gloves,
contact lenses, and toothbrushes. Birth control devices include,
but are not limited to, intrauterine devices (IUDs), diaphragms,
and condoms.
As used herein, the term "therapeutic agent," refers to
compositions that decrease the infectivity, morbidity, or onset
of mortality in a subject (e.g., a subject contacted by a
biofilm- forming microorganism) or that prevent infectivity,
morbidity, or onset of mortality in a host contacted by a
biofilm- forming microorganism. As used herein, therapeutic
agents encompass agents used prophylactically, e.g. , in the
absence of a bio film- forming organism, in view of possible
future exposure to a bio film-forming organism. Such agents may
additionally comprise pharmaceutically acceptable compounds
{e.g. , adjuvants, excipients, stabilizers, diluents, and the
like). In some embodiments, the therapeutic agents of the
present invention are administered in the form of topical
compositions, injectable compositions, ingestible compositions,
and the like. When the route is topical, the form may be, for
example, a solution, cream, ointment, salve or spray.
As used herein, the term "pathogen" refers to a biological agent
that causes a disease state {e.g., infection, cancer, etc.) in a
host. "Pathogens" include, but are not limited to, viruses,
bacteria, archaea, fungi, protozoans, mycoplasma, prions, and
parasitic organisms.
As used herein, the term "microbe" refers to a microorganism and
is intended to encompass both an individual organism, or a
preparation comprising any number of the organisms.
As used herein, the term "microorganism" refers to any species
or type of microorganism, including but not limited to,
bacteria, archaea, fungi, protozoans, mycoplasma, and parasitic
organisms.
As used herein, the term "fungi" is used in reference to
eukaryotic organisms such as the molds and yeasts, including
dimorphic fungi.
The terms "bacteria" and "bacterium" refer to all prokaryotic
organisms, including those within all of the phyla in the
Kingdom Procaryotae. It is intended that the term encompass all
microorganisms considered to be bacteria including Mycoplasma,
Chlamydia, Actinomyces, Streptomyces, and Rickettsia. All forms
of bacteria are included within this definition including cocci,
bacilli, spirochetes, spheroplasts, protoplasts, etc. Also
included within this term are prokaryotic organisms that are
Gram-negative or Gram-positive. "Gram- negative" and
"Gram-positive" refer to staining patterns with the
Gram-staining process, which is well known in the art. (See
e.g., Finegold and Martin, Diagnostic Microbiology, 6th Ed., CV
Mosby St. Louis, pp. 13-15 (1982)). "Gram-positive bacteria" are
bacteria that retain the primary dye used in the Gram-stain,
causing the stained cells to generally appear dark blue to
purple under the microscope. "Gram-negative bacteria" do not
retain the primary dye used in the Gram-stain, but are stained
by the counterstain. Thus, Gram-negative bacteria generally
appear red.
The term "non-pathogenic bacteria" or "non-pathogenic bacterium"
includes all known and unknown non-pathogenic bacterium
(Gram-positive or Gram-negative) and any pathogenic bacterium
that has been mutated or converted to a non-pathogenic
bacterium. Furthermore, a skilled artisan recognizes that some
bacteria may be pathogenic to specific species and
non-pathogenic to other species; thus, these bacteria can be
utilized in the species in which it is non-pathogenic or mutated
so that it is non-pathogenic.
As used herein, the term "non-human animals" refers to all
non-human animals including, but are not limited to, vertebrates
such as rodents, non-human primates, ovines, bovines, ruminants,
lagomorphs, porcines, caprines, equines, canines, felines, aves,
etc.
As used herein, the term "cell culture" refers to any in vitro
culture of cells, including, e.g., prokaryotic cells and
eukaryotic cells. Included within this term are continuous cell
lines (e.g., with an immortal phenotype), primary cell cultures,
transformed cell lines, finite cell lines (e.g., non-transformed
cells), bacterial cultures in or on solid or liquid media, and
any other cell population maintained in vitro.
The term "coating" as used herein refers to a layer of material
covering, e.g., a medical device or a portion thereof. A coating
can be applied to the surface or impregnated within the material
of the implant.
As used herein, the term "antimicrobial agent" refers to
composition that decreases, prevents or inhibits the growth of
bacterial and/or fungal organisms. Examples of antimicrobial
agents include, e.g., antibiotics and antiseptics.
The term "antiseptic" as used herein is defined as an
antimicrobial substance that inhibits the action of
microorganisms, including but not limited to a-terpineol,
methylisothiazolone, cetylpyridinium chloride, chloroxyleneol,
hexachlorophene,
chlorhexidine and other cationic biguanides, methylene chloride,
iodine and iodophores, triclosan, taurinamides, nitrofurantoin,
methenamine, aldehydes, azylic acid, silver, benzyl peroxide,
alcohols, and carboxylic acids and salts. One skilled in the art
is cognizant that these antiseptics can be used in combinations
of two or more to obtain a synergistic or additive effect. Some
examples of combinations of antiseptics include a mixture of
chlorhexidine, chlorhexidine and chloroxylenol, chlorhexidine
and methylisothiazolone, chlorhexidine and (a-terpineol,
methylisothiazolone and a-terpineol; thymol and chloroxylenol;
chlorhexidine and cetylpyridinium chloride; or chlorhexidine,
methylisothiazolone and thymol. These combinations provide a
broad spectrum of activity against a wide variety of organisms.
The term "antibiotics" as used herein is defined as a substance
that inhibits the growth of microorganisms, preferably without
damage to the host. For example, the antibiotic may inhibit cell
wall synthesis, protein synthesis, nucleic acid synthesis, or
alter cell membrane function.
Classes of antibiotics include, but are not limited to, macro
lides (e.g., erythromycin), penicillins (e.g., nafcillin),
cephalosporins (e.g., cefazolin), carbapenems (e.g., imipenem),
monobactam (e.g., aztreonam), other beta- lactam antibiotics,
beta-lactam inhibitors (e.g., sulbactam), oxalines (e.g.
linezolid), aminoglycosides (e.g., gentamicin), chloramphenicol,
sufonamides (e.g., sulfamethoxazole), glycopeptides (e.g.,
vancomycin), quinolones (e.g., ciprofloxacin), tetracyclines
(e.g., minocycline), fusidic acid, trimethoprim, metronidazole,
clindamycin, mupirocin, rifamycins (e.g., rifampin),
streptogramins (e.g., quinupristin and dalfopristin) lipoprotein
(e.g., daptomycin), polyenes (e.g., amphotericin B), azoles
(e.g., fluconazole), and echinocandins (e.g., caspofungin
acetate).
Examples of specific antibiotics include, but are not limited
to, erythromycin, nafcillin, cefazolin, imipenem, aztreonam,
gentamicin, sulfamethoxazole, vancomycin, ciprofloxacin,
trimethoprim, rifampin, metronidazole, clindamycin, teicoplanin,
mupirocin, azithromycin, clarithromycin, ofloxacin,
lomefloxacin, norfloxacin, nalidixic acid, sparfloxacin,
pefloxacin, amifloxacin, gatifloxacin, moxifloxacin,
gemifloxacin, enoxacin, fleroxacin, minocycline, linezolid,
temafloxacin, tosufloxacin, clinafloxacin, sulbactam, clavulanic
acid, amphotericin B, fluconazole, itraconazole, ketoconazole,
and nystatin. Other examples of antibiotics, such as those
listed in Sakamoto et al, U.S. Pat. No. 4,642, 104 herein
incorporated by reference will readily suggest themselves to
those of ordinary skill in the art.
As used herein, the term "sample" is used in its broadest sense.
In one sense, it is meant to include a specimen or culture
obtained from any source, as well as biological and
environmental samples. Biological samples may be obtained from
animals (including humans) and encompass fluids, solids,
tissues, and gases. Biological samples include blood products,
such as plasma, serum and the like. Such examples are not
however to be construed as limiting the sample types applicable
to the present invention.
DETAILED
DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The present disclosure relates to compositions and methods for
destabilizing biofilms, altering biofilm 3D structure, and
dispersing biofilms, in order to enhance biofilm cell removal
and/or sensitivity to other agents (e.g., environmental or
co-applied treatments). In particular, the present disclosure
relates to the use of L-arginine in the removal and/or
sensitization (e.g., to antimicrobials) of microorganisms in
medical, industrial, domestic, or environmental applications, as
well as treatment of bacterial infections (e.g., in biofilms).
A biofilm is an aggregate of microorganisms in which cells
adhere to each other and/or to a surface. These adherent cells
are frequently embedded within a self-produced matrix of
extracellular polymeric substance (EPS). Biofilm EPS, also
referred to as slime, is a polymeric conglomeration generally
composed of extracellular DNA, proteins, and polysaccharides in
various configurations and of various compositions. Biofilms may
form on living or non-living surfaces, and represent a prevalent
mode of microbial life in natural, industrial and clinical
settings. The microbial cells growing in a biofilm are
physiologically distinct from planktonic cells of the same
organism, which, by contrast, are single cells that may float or
swim in a liquid medium.
Microbial biofilms form in response to many factors including
but not limited to cellular recognition of specific or
non-specific attachment sites on a surface, nutritional cues, or
in some cases, by exposure of planktonic cells to sub-inhibitory
concentrations of antibiotics. When a cell switches to the
biofilm mode of growth, it undergoes a phenotypic shift in
behavior in which large suites of genes are differentially
regulated (Petrova et al., J. Bacteriol. 2012
May;194(10):2413-25; Stoodley et al, Annu Rev Microbiol.
2002;56: 187- 209).
Although the present invention is not limited by any type of
biofilm, biofilm formation typically begins with the attachment
of free-floating microorganisms to a surface. These first
colonists adhere to the surface initially through weak,
reversible Van der Waals forces. If the colonists are not
immediately separated from the surface, they can anchor
themselves more permanently using cell adhesion structures such
as pili.
Initial colonists commonly facilitate the arrival of other cells
by providing more diverse adhesion sites and beginning to build
the matrix that holds the biofilm together. Some species are not
able to attach to a surface on their own but are often able to
anchor themselves to the matrix or directly to earlier
colonists. It is during this colonization that the cells are
able to communicate via quorum sensing, for example, using such
compounds as N-acyl homoserine lactone (AHL). Once colonization
initiates, the biofilm grows through a combination of cell
division and recruitment. The final stage of biofilm formation
is known as development although herein the terms "formation"
and "development" are used interchangeably. In this final stage,
the biofilm is established and may only change in shape and
size. The development of a biofilm may allow for an aggregate
cell colony (or colonies) to be increasingly antibiotic
resistant.
Dispersal of cells from the biofilm colony is an essential stage
of the biofilm lifecycle.
Dispersal enables bio films to spread and colonize new surfaces.
Enzymes that degrade the biofilm extracellular matrix, such as
dispersin B and deoxyribonuclease, may play a role in biofilm
dispersal (Whitchurch et al. (2002) Science 295: 1487; herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety). Biofilm matrix
degrading enzymes may be useful as anti-biofilm agents (Kaplan
et al. (2004) Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 48 (7):
2633-6; Xavier et al. (2005) Microbiology 151 (Pt 12): 3817-32;
each herein incorporated by reference in its entirety). A fatty
acid messenger, cis-2-decenoic acid, can induce dispersion and
inhibit growth of biofilm colonies. Secreted by Pseudomonas
aeruginosa, this compound induces dispersion in several species
of bacteria and the yeast Candida albicans (Davies et al. (2009)
Journal of Bacteriology 191 (5): 1393-403; herein incorporated
by reference in its entirety).
Biofilms are ubiquitous and are usually found on solid
substrates submerged in or exposed to some aqueous solution,
although they can form as floating mats on liquid surfaces and
also on the surface of leaves, particularly in high humidity
climates. Given sufficient resources for growth, a biofilm will
quickly grow to be macroscopic. Many types of microbes can form
biofilms, e.g., bacteria, archaea, protozoa, fungi and algae.
Biofilms may comprise a single type of microbe (monospecies
biofilms), or, commonly, multiple types. In some mixed species
biofilms, each group performs specialized metabolic functions.
Biofilms form in environments including but not limited to:
substrates (e.g., rocks, pebbles) in natural bodies of water
(e.g., rivers, pools, streams, oceans, springs); extreme
environments (e.g., hot springs including waters with extremely
acidic or extremely alkaline pH; frozen glaciers); residential
and industrial settings in which solid surfaces are exposed to
liquid (e.g., showers, water and sewage pipes, floors and
counters in food preparation or processing areas, water-cooling
systems, marine engineering systems); hulls and interiors of
marine vessels; sewage and water treatment facilities (e.g.,
water filters, pipes, holding tanks); contaminated waters;
within or upon living organisms (e.g., dental plaque, surface
colonization or infection of e.g., skin, surfaces of tissues or
organs or body cavities or at wound sites; plant epidermis,
interior of plants); on the inert surfaces of implanted devices
such as catheters, prosthetic cardiac valves, artificial joints,
and intrauterine devices; and the like.
Biofilms are involved in a wide variety of microbial infections
in the body. Infectious processes in which biofilms have been
implicated include but are not limited to urinary tract
infections, catheter infections, middle-ear infections,
formation of dental plaque and gingivitis, contact lens
contamination (Imamura et al. (2008) Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy 52 (1): 171-82; herein incorporated by reference in
its entirety), and less common but more lethal processes such as
endocarditis, infections in cystic fibrosis, and infections of
permanent indwelling devices such as joint prostheses and heart
valves (Lewis et al. (2001) Antimicrobial Agents and
Chemotherapy 45 (4): 999-1007; Parsek et al. (2003) Annual
Review of Microbiology 57: 677-701; each herein incorporated by
reference in its entirety). Bacterial biofilms may impair
cutaneous wound healing and reduce topical antibacterial
efficiency in healing or treating infected skin wounds (Davis et
al. (2008) Wound Repair and Regeneration 16 (1): 23-9; herein
incorporated by reference in its entirety).
Coaggregation is the highly specific recognition and adhesion of
genetically distinct bacteria mediated by complementary protein
adhesins and polysaccharide receptors on the cell surface of
coaggregating cells (Kolenbrander, Annu Rev Microbiol 54,
413-437, 2000; Rickard et al., Trends Microbiol 11, 94-100,
2003a). This phenomenon is distinct from autoaggregation, which
is the recognition and adhesion of genetically identical
bacteria to one another (Khemaleelakul et al. , J Endod 32,
312-318, 2006; Rickard et al. , FEMS
Microbiol Lett 220, 133-140, 2003b; Van Houdt & Michiels,
Res Microbiol 156, 626-633, 2005). Coaggregation was first
described between human dental plaque bacteria in 1970 (Gibbons
& Nygaard, Arch Oral Biol 15, 1397-1400, 1970), and work
over the last two decades has shown that it also occurs between
bacteria isolated from the human gut, the human urogenital
tract, in wastewater floes, and freshwater biofilms (Ledder et
al. , FEMS Microbiol Ecol 66, 630-636, 2008; Phuong et al, J
Biotechnol, 2011; Reid et al, Can J Microbiol 34, 344-351, 1988;
Rickard et al, Appl Environ Microbiol 66, 431-434, 2000; Simoes
et al, Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 1259-1263, 2008).
Coaggregation has also been shown to occur among numerous
taxonomically distinct freshwater species (Rickard et al , Appl
Environ Microbiol 68, 3644-3650, 2002; Rickard et al, 2003b,
supra; Rickard et al, Appl Environ Microbiol 70, 7426-7435,
2004b; Simoes et al, Appl Environ Microbiol 74, 1259-1263, 2008)
and in planktonic and biofilm populations (Rickard et al , J
Appl Microbiol 96, 1367-1373, 2004a). Studies of coaggregation
between Sphingomonas (Blastomonas) natatoria and Micrococcus
luteus demonstrated that the ability of a species to coaggregate
alters dual-species biofilm development in both flowing and
static environments (Min & Rickard, Appl Environ Microbiol
75, 3987-3997, 2009; Min et al, Biofouling 26, 931-940, 2010).
Coaggregation may mediate biofilm development, architectural
changes, and alterations in the species composition (Hojo et al,
J Dent Res 88, 982-990, 2009;
Kolenbrander et al, Periodontal 2000 42, 47-79, 2006; Rickard et
al, 2003a, supra). In addition, coaggregation may play a role in
promoting or hindering the integration of pathogenic species
into freshwater biofilms (Buswell et al, Appl Environ Microbiol
64, 733- 741, 1998). Evidence to support such a possibility can
be found in studies of dental plaque biofilms where
coaggregation has been indicated to promote the integration of
oral pathogens such as Porphyromonas gingivalis (Kolenbrander et
al, Periodontal 2000 42, 47-79, 2006; Whitmore & Lamont, Mol
Microbiol 81, 305-314, 2011).
Dental plaque is composed of hundreds of species of bacteria
that can collectively cause oral and systemic diseases
(Jakubovics et al, Oral diseases. 2010;16(8):729-39; Kuo et al,
Public Health. 2008;122(4):417-33.). During dental plaque
development, bacteria sense and respond to numerous exogenous
bacterial- or environmental-derived chemicals which alter their
ability to establish themselves within these biofilms.
Oral biofilms cause major problems throughout both
industrialized and developing countries. Data from recent
surveys indicate that 23.7% of US adults have untreated dental
caries while 38.5% of adults have moderate to severe
periodontitis (National Center for
Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011 : With Special
Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville, MD:
2012; Eke et al, Journal of dental research. 2012;91(10):914-
20). Untreated dental caries also affects between 15-20% of
children up to 19 years, while periodontitis is a major problem
in the elderly population, where 64% of adults over 65 years
have moderate to severe forms of the condition (National Center
for Health Statistics. Health, United States, 2011 : With
Special Feature on Socioeconomic Status and Health. Hyattsville,
MD: 2012; Eke et al, Journal of dental research.
2012;91(10):914-20). Clearly, new methods for controlling dental
plaque-related diseases are urgently needed. Dental plaque is a
finely balanced homeostatic bacterial community (Marsh et al.,
Periodontology 2000. 2011 ;55(1): 16-35). Embodiments of the
present invention provide a broad-acting intervention that
alters the balance of such oral bacterial communities and is
more effective at controlling dental plaque -related diseases
than strategies that target individual species. Dental plaque
contains an interactive "aware" community of microbes. On
cleaned tooth-surfaces, dental plaque develops through a
microbial succession (Jakubovics et al, supra; Kolenbrander et
al, Nature reviews Microbiology. 2010;8(7):471-80; Kolenbrander
et al., Periodontology 2000. 2006;42:47-79 23, 24). Initial
colonizers, predominantly
Streptococcus species, adhere to salivary pellicle and produce
thin layers of bio film that support the integration of other
species through coaggregation, cell-cell signalling, and
metabolite recognition (Jakubovics et al, supra; Kolenbrander et
al, Nature reviews
Microbiology. 2010;8(7):471-80; Hojo et al, Journal of dental
research. 2009;88(11):982-90; Rickard et al., Trends Microbiol.
2003;11(2):94-100; Bowden et al., Advances in dental research.
1997;1 l(l):81-99). Coaggregation involves specific recognition
and adhesion between bacteria and brings different species in
close proximity. This increases the potential to exchange
cell-cell signalling molecules or metabolites (Kolenbrander et
al., Nature reviews Microbiology. 2010;8(7):471-80; Hojo et al,
supra). For example, the signalling molecule autoinducer-2
(AI-2)mediates mutualistic growth of the coaggregating partners
Streptococcus oralis and Actinomyces oris, and facilitates the
development of bio films containing the coaggregating partners
S. gordonii and S. oralis (Cuadra-Saenz et al, Microbiology.
2012;158(Pt 7): 1783-95; Rickard et al, Molecular microbiology.
2006;60(6): 1446-56.). Examples of important metabolites include
hydrogen peroxide, which is produced by some streptococci, and
inhibits other species including mutans streptococci (Zhu et al,
Oxid Med Cell Longev. 2012;2012:717843), and lactate which is
produced by streptococci and used by coaggregating Veillonella
species for energy (Egland et al, Proceedings of the National
Academy of Sciences of the United States of America. 2004;
101(48): 16917-22). Arginine is important in metabolite exchange
(Jakubovics et al., supra) but, unlike other mechanisms of
communication, it also disrupts coaggregation between oral
bacteria and appears to have a major impact upon biofilm
structure (Edwards et al., Oral microbiology and immunology.
2007;22(4):217-24; Sato et al, J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2012;
Ellen et al, Oral microbiology and immunology. 1992;7(4):
198-203.).
Thus, arginine, although receiving limited attention to date, is
a key global moderator of biofilm development and a pivotal
component in the onset of caries or periodontal disease
(Nascimento et al., Oral microbiology and immunology.
2009;24(2):89-95). The concept of 'nutritional virulence',
whereby bacterial systems for acquiring nutrients from the host
are considered key factors for pathogenesis, is emerging as an
important paradigm for infectious diseases (Abu Kwaik et al,
Cellular microbiology. 2013;15(6):882-90). Amino acids in
particular are often a growth-limiting resource for bacteria.
Even when species possess all the genes required for amino acid
biosynthesis, they may be functionally auxotrophic in certain
conditions. For example, Staphylococcus aureus possesses the
full genetic pathway encoding the biosynthesis of L-arginine
from L-glutamate, yet cannot grow in vitro without L-arginine
(Nuxoll et al, PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(1 l):el003033). Similarly,
S. gordonii can
biosynthesize L-arginine anaerobically but is a functional
arginine auxotroph in aerobic conditions (Jakubovics et al.,
supra). Oral streptococci have varied requirements for amino
acids in vitro (Cowman et al, Applied microbiology.
1975;30(3):374-80; Cowman et al, Journal of dental research.
1978;57(1):48; Terleckyj et al, Infect Immun. 1975;11(4):656-
64), and it is not well understood how these nutritional
deficiencies restrict growth in dental plaque. Early colonizing
bacteria obtain most of their nutrients from saliva (Bowden et
al., Advances in dental research. 1997; 1 l(l):81-99). Human
saliva can contain up to 40 µ? free arginine (Van Wuyckhuyse et
al, Journal of dental research. 1995;74(2):686-90). S. gordonii
is unable to grow aerobically in <25 µ? L-arginine
(Jakubovics et al., supra). Arginine restriction of S. gordonii
growth can be overcome by coaggregation with A. oris (Jakubovics
et al, supra). Expression of S. gordonii arginine biosynthesis
genes is strongly down- regulated in coaggregates compared with
monocultures, indicating that coaggregation relieves
low-arginine stress. Further, coaggregation with A. oris
supported growth of S. gordonii under arginine-limited
conditions. Therefore, inter-bacterial interactions are
important for growth in saliva.
I.
Therapeutic Methods
Experiments conducted during the course of development of
embodiments of the present disclosure demonstrated that high
concentrations of arginine abrogate biofilm formation by S.
gordonii. Biofilm formation was highly sensitive to millimolar
levels of arginine in a dose-dependent manner.
Arginine concentrations in saliva are thought to stay low due to
continuous uptake into cells and turnover by bacterial arginine
deiaminase systems (ADS's), which catabolise arginine to ATP,
ammonia and L-glutamine (Van Wuyckhuyse et al., Journal of
dental research. 1995;74(2):686-90). The production of ammonia
increases the local pH of plaque, which protects against caries
(Liu et al., International journal of oral science. 2012;4(3):
135- 40.). The ADS's of the opportunistic pathogens Pseudomonas
aeruginosa and S. aureus are up-regulated in biofilms and these
systems are essential to protect cells from oxygen and
glycolysis-derived acids (39, 40). The ADS's of oral
streptococci have been shown to influence biofilm formation in
mixed-species systems, where removal of L-arginine by S.
intermedius ADS inhibits biofilm formation by the periodontal
pathogen P. gingivalis (Cugini et al, Microbiology. 2013;159(Pt
2):275-85). Production of ADS's is controlled at the level of
transcription by ArgR/AhrC family regulators such as ArcR (Liu
et al., Applied and environmental microbiology.
2008;74(16):5023-30; Zeng et al., Journal of bacteriology.
2006;188(3):941-9). ArcR is important for S. gordonii biofilm
formation in nutrient-rich growth media.
Further experiments described herein demonstrated that
L-arginine reduces the pathogenic potential of biofilms by
reducing the biofilm biomass and reducing the total amount and
proportion of pathogens (e.g., without direct antimicrobial
activity); and L- arginine augments/enhances the activity of
antimicrobials such as CPC. This is through enhancing access of
antimicrobial by loosening biofilm and also by altering the
growth-rate of the bacteria; L-arginine causes cell-cell
signaling dysregulation; L-arginine is a combinational treatment
that up-regulates metabolism, alters cell-cell signaling, and
inhibits cell-cell adhesion; and L-arginine increases the
proportion of beneficial bacteria that can combat the negative
effects of potential pathogens such as S. mutans.
Accordingly, embodiments of the present invention provide
compositions (e.g., pharmaceutical or research compositions or
kits) comprising L-arginine (e.g., alone or in combination with
CPC) and pharmaceutical, industrial, or research methods of
using L- arginine in the treatment and prevention of bacterial
infections (e.g., dental plaque) and in decontamination of
surfaces (e.g., surfaces of medical devices).
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides
compositions and methods for using L-arginine to disrupt
cell-cell interactions (adhesion) within a biofilm, disrupt
bacterial homeostasis, induce cell-damage and killing, disrupt
intra-cellular processes leading to deregulation/loss of
homeostasis, disrupt cell-cell adhesion in biofilms, biofilm 3D
rearrangement of architecture, disrupt cell-cell signaling,
disrupt cell-cell metabolic interactions, and/or disrupt
adhesion to surfaces. In some embodiments, L-arginine induces
one or more of the above and these work individually and
collectively to kill and/or reduce cell-activity and reduce
biofilm biomass. In some embodiments, this also allows for
improved killing with antimicrobials (e.g. L-arginine -
antimicrobial agents or cocktails).
In some embodiments, the present invention provides compositions
comprising L- arginine, alone or in combination with a
pharmaceutically acceptable carrier or other desired delivery
material (e.g., cleaner or disinfectant, etc.).
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides
compositions (e.g., dental care compositions such as toothpaste,
mouthwash, etc.) comprising L-arginine in combination with e.g.,
CPC.
Pharmaceutical compositions and formulations for topical
administration may include transdermal patches, ointments,
lotions, creams, gels, drops, suppositories, sprays, liquids,
mouthwash, and powders. Conventional pharmaceutical carriers,
aqueous, powder or oily bases, thickeners and the like may be
necessary or desirable.
Compositions and formulations for oral administration include
powders or granules, suspensions or solutions in water or
non-aqueous media, capsules, sachets or tablets.
Thickeners, flavoring agents, diluents, emulsifiers, dispersing
aids or binders may be desirable.
Compositions and formulations for parenteral, intrathecal or
intraventricular administration may include sterile aqueous
solutions that may also contain buffers, diluents and other
suitable additives such as, but not limited to, penetration
enhancers, carrier compounds and other pharmaceutically
acceptable carriers or excipients.
Pharmaceutical compositions of the present disclosure include,
but are not limited to, solutions, emulsions, and
liposome-containing formulations. These compositions may be
generated from a variety of components that include, but are not
limited to, preformed liquids, self-emulsifying solids and
self-emulsifying semisolids.
The pharmaceutical formulations, which may conveniently be
presented in unit dosage form, may be prepared according to
conventional techniques well known in the pharmaceutical
industry.
The compositions may additionally contain other adjunct
components conventionally found in pharmaceutical compositions.
Thus, for example, the compositions may contain additional,
compatible, pharmaceutically-active materials such as, for
example, antipruritics, astringents, local anesthetics or
anti-inflammatory agents, or may contain additional materials
useful in physically formulating various dosage forms of the
compositions, such as dyes, flavoring agents, preservatives,
antioxidants, opacifiers, thickening agents and stabilizers.
However, such materials, when added, should not unduly interfere
with the biological activities of the components of the
compositions. The formulations can be sterilized and, if
desired, mixed with auxiliary agents, e.g., lubricants,
preservatives, stabilizers, wetting agents, emulsifiers, salts
for influencing osmotic pressure, buffers, colorings, flavorings
and/or aromatic substances and the like which do not
deleteriously interact with the active agents of the
formulation.
In some embodiments, the pharmaceutical composition contains a)
L-arginine, and b) one or more other agents useful in killing or
preventing the growth of microorganisms (e.g., antibiotics) or
impacting the growth, formation or health impact or
microorganisms in bio films.
In some embodiments, the present invention provides kits,
pharmaceutical compositions, or other delivery systems for use
of L-arginine in treating or preventing bacterial infections or
biofilms present on surfaces (e.g., dental plaque). The kit may
include any and all components necessary, useful or sufficient
for research or therapeutic uses including, but not limited to,
L-arginine, pharmaceutical carriers, and additional components
useful, necessary or sufficient for treating or preventing
bacterial infections. In some embodiments, the kits provide a
sub-set of the required components, wherein it is expected that
the user will supply the remaining components. In some
embodiments, the kits comprise two or more separate containers
wherein each container houses a subset of the components to be
delivered. Optionally, compositions and kits comprise other
active components in order to achieve desired therapeutic
effects.
In some embodiments, L-arginine is used to kill bacteria in
coaggregates or biofilms. The compositions comprising L-arginine
described herein find use in the killing or inhibition of growth
of a variety of microorganisms (e.g., pathogenic bacteria or
fungi). In some embodiments, L-arginine or compositions
comprising L-arginine find use in the treatment of bacterial
infections in or on the body (e.g., bacterial infections in
coaggregates or biofilms). In some embodiments, L-arginine or
compositions thereof are used to treat bacterial infections in
wounds, sepsis, pathogenic bacterial infections in the stomach
or intestine, and the like.
In some embodiments, pharmaceutical compositions are
administering in a maintenance or ongoing manner (e.g., one or
more times a day, two or more times a day, one or more times a
week, etc.). In some embodiments, compositions are administered
continuously (e.g., via a skin patch, bandage, or time release
formulation). In some embodiments, compositions are administered
once, twice, 5 times, 10 times or more. In some embodiments,
compositions are administered over a period of weeks, months,
years or indefinitely
In some embodiments, L-arginine or compositions comprising
L-arginine find use in the decontamination of medical devices
(e.g., catheters, speculums, and the like) or implantable
medical devices (e.g., pacemakers, internal defibrillators,
artificial joints or bones and the like).
In some embodiments, L-arginine or compositions comprising
L-arginine find use in the decontamination of surfaces (e.g.,
surfaces comprising biofilms). Examples include but are not
limited to, household surfaces, hospital or clinical surfaces
(e.g., exam tables, operating rooms, etc.), and the like.
In some embodiments, L-arginine or compositions comprising
L-arginine find use in the decontamination or protection of food
or food preparation areas. For example, in some embodiments,
L-arginine is applied to a food after harvest to protect against
future contamination or treat existing contamination.
In some embodiments, L-arginine or compositions comprising
L-arginine find use in treating and/or preventing dental carries
and gum disease. In some embodiments, L-arginine is added to
mouthwash, toothpaste, or other oral care products.
II.
Screening compositions and methods
Embodiments of the present disclosure provide compositions and
methods for determining levels of biofilm components (e.g.
arginine or AI-2) in biofilms or planktonic cells. Arginine is
internalized by streptococci and sensed through the action of
three different, but related, regulatory proteins: ArcR, AhrC
and ArgR. These alter their conformation when they bind to
arginine so that they either bind to promoter sequences or are
released from promoters.
Accordingly, embodiments of the present disclosure provide a
plasmid that reports expression or concentration of a component
in a biofilm or planktonic cell culture. In some embodiments,
the plasmid comprises a first detectable (e.g., fluorescent)
marker under the control of a bacterial promoter that is
constitutively expressed or a second marker (e.g., a different
color fluorescent label), that is induced by the component in
the biofilm (e.g., arginine or AI-2 present in the biofilm or
cell culture). The present disclosure is not limited to
particular promoters or reporter genes. Examples of fluorescent
markers include, but are not limited to, luciferase,
chloramphenicol acetyltransferase, green fluorescent protein
(GFP), or Mcherry. In some embodiments, the promoter is a
streptococcal promoter (e.g., a promoter active in S. gordonii
such as, e.g., S. gordonii DL1 50S ribosomal protein (SGO l
192), S. gordonii argC or arcA promoters, or catabolite control
protein A (SGO 0773)). In some embodiments, the 50S ribosomal
protein promoter or other streptococcal ribosomal promoters or
lactococcal promoters such as usp45 serve as control promoters
for constitutive expression of the first marker. In some
embodiments, catabolite control protein A promoter is a reporter
of AI-2. In some embodiments, argC or arcA promoters are
responsive to arginine.
In some embodiments, the present disclosure provides methods of
using the plasmids described herein to monitor concentration of
components (e.g., arginine or AI-2) of a biofilm or planktonic
cell population (e.g., in a streptococcal spp. such as S.
gordonii), comprising: a) contacting a streptococcal cell with
the promoters described herein; and b) measuring the level of
marker. In some embodiments, the level of signal from the marker
under the control of the promoter induced by the external
biofilm component or the constitutive promoter is compared to
level of signal from known quantities/concentrations of the
component (e.g., a standard curve). In some embodiments, the
level of fluorescence is then be correlated in a fluorimeter or
imaging system.
In some embodiments, the reporter plasmids and methods find use
in research, screening (e.g., drug screening), and diagnostic
applications. For example, in some embodiments, test compounds
(e.g., antimicrobial drugs) are added to a biofilm or planktonic
cell population and the effect of the test compound on levels of
biofilm components (e.g., arginine) is assayed.
EXPERIMENTAL
The following examples are provided in order to demonstrate and
further illustrate certain preferred embodiments and aspects of
the present invention and are not to be construed as limiting
the scope thereof.
Example 1 This example relates to bio films formed by single
species of bacteria. In these systems, L-arginine has diverse
effects on bacterial gene regulation, phenotype, metabolism and
biofilm formation.
Arginine sensing triggers gene regulation.
S. gordonii contains the full genetic pathway for biosynthesis
of L-arginine. However, like S. aureus, it is a functional
arginine auxotroph under laboratory conditions (Jakubovics et
al, supra, Nuxoll et al, PLoS pathogens. 2012;8(1 l):el003033).
A shift from arginine - replete medium to arginine-deficient
medium resulted in a marked change in phenotype of S. gordonii.
In addition to genes previously shown to be regulated by
coaggregation, there was a significant decrease in the
expression of several well-characterized cell surface adhesins
(Table 1). In general, metabolism was decreased with the
exception of the arginine biosynthesis pathway, which was
strongly up-regulated (Figure 2). These data are consistent with
the development of a specialized biofilm dispersal cell state,
similar to that produced by the dimorphic aquatic bacterium
Caulobacter crescentus, upon nutrient limitation (England et
al., Journal of bacteriology. 2010;192(3):819-33.). This example
relates to biofilms formed by single species of bacteria. In
these systems, L-arginine has diverse effects on bacterial gene
regulation, phenotype, metabolism and biofilm formation.
Biofilm formation in an environmentally germane microfluidic
biofilm system.
The effects of arginine-dependent dosing of S. gordonii biofilms
is assessed in a modified Bioflux microfluidics system. Human
saliva is collected and pooled from >6 different volunteers
(Cuadra-Saenz et al, Microbiology. 2012;158(Pt 7): 1783-95),
diluted to 25%, and additional supplements (e.g. sucrose,
haemin, BHI) added as required to simulate different conditions.
Note, we grow robust biofilms in even non-supplemented saliva
and pooling the saliva minimizes variation in salivary
components. To obtain an indication of free arginine levels in
pooled saliva, arginine is measured in >3 different pooled
saliva samples using standard techniques (Jakubovics et al,
supra; Van Wuyckhuyse et al., Journal of dental research.
1995;74(2):686-90). The 24 channels of the Bioflux system are
coated with saliva, inoculated with monocultures of S. gordonii
(or multi-species biofilms harvested form saliva) and biofilms
are developed at 37°C with cell free saliva. After 20 h, cells
are stained with live/dead stain and visualized using a Leica
SPE CLSM. Biomass and structural biofilm parameters are
quantified using COMSTAT (Heydorn et al., Microbiology. 2000;
146 ( Pt 10):2395-407), ImageJ (Collins, Biotechniques.
2007;43(1 Suppl):25-30), and IMARIS software (Bitplane,
Switzerland). Figure 3 shows that high concentrations of
arginine (500 mM) significantly reduce the extent of bio film
present. Arginine and bacterial biofilm formation.
Arginine has been shown to play a key role in biofilm formation
and host colonization by Gram-positive and Gram-negative
bacteria. For example, at physiological concentrations found in
cystic fibrosis sputum, arginine promotes P. aeruginosa biofilm
formation (Bernier et al., Research in microbiology.
2011;162(7):680-8). Arginine was the only amino acid that
prevented swarming by P. aeruginosa, and thus plays a pivotal
role in promoting a sessile lifestyle in this species (Bernier
et al, supra). In S. aureus, the final gene in the arginine
biosynthesis pathway, argH, is essential for virulence in a
mouse kidney abscess model, indicating that arginine is
restricted in vivo (Nuxoll et al., supra). Many oral
streptococci are auxotrophic or conditionally auxotrophic for
arginine (Jakubovics et al., supra, Cowman et al. Applied
microbiology. 1975;30(3):374-80; Terleckyj et al, Infect Immun.
1975;11(4):656- 64; Cowman et al, Applied microbiology.
1974;27(l):86-92; Rogers et al, Journal of general microbiology.
1990;136(12):2545-50). The importance of the S. gordonii
arginine
biosynthesis pathway for growth in salivary biofilms is
investigated using an argH mutant and a complemented strain. The
present invention is not limited to a particular mechanism.
Indeed, an understanding of the mechanism is not necessary to
practice the present invention. Nonetheless, it is contemplated
that arginine is a limiting nutrient for L-arginine
biosynthesis- deficient streptococci growing as single-species
colonies in salivary biofilms. Further, it is contemplated that
coaggregation with other species in the biofilm overcomes the
effects of L- arginine restriction but is subject to disruption
by adding elevated amounts of L-arginine.
Arginine catabolism in biofilms.
In biofilm cells of P. aeruginosa, arginine metabolism is
up-regulated
compared with planktonic cells, due to an increase in expression
of genes encoding the arginine deiminase system (ADS) (Xu et al,
PloS one. 2013;8(2):e57050; Sauer et al, Journal of
bacteriology. 2002; 184(4): 1140-54). The ADS is a key component
of anaerobic metabolism in this organism. The switch to
ADS-mediated anaerobic fermentation is linked to increased
susceptibility of P. aeruginosa to ciprofloxacin and tobramycin
(Borriello et al., Antimicrobial agents and chemotherapy.
2004;48(7):2659-64). The ADS is also important in the
pathogenicity of S. aureus. Indeed, the US A300 pathogenic
lineage of S. aureus has acquired a genetic element termed the
Arginine Catabolic Mobile Element (ACME), which contains genes
encoding an ADS pathway and is thought to be a key factor in
promoting growth and survival on the skin (Otto et al.,
International journal of medical microbiology: IJMM. 2013). As
such, the ACME may be important for the high transmissibility of
USA300 strains.
High concentrations of arginine negatively affect the ability of
certain oral bacteria to colonize oral bio films. Arginine has
been shown to inhibit several different coaggregation
interactions between oral bacteria (Edwards et al., Oral
microbiology and immunology. 2007;22(4):217-24; George et al,
Oral microbiology and immunology. 1992;7(5):285-90. PubMed PMID:
1494452; Kaplan et al, Molecular microbiology. 2009;71(l):35-47;
Takemoto et al., Journal of periodontal research.
1993;28(l):21-6.; Nagata et al., Journal of dental research.
1990;69(8): 1476-9.). Data described herein shows that the
disruption of coaggregation within oral bio films leads to the
release of bacteria from the biofilm. Nutrients induce
dispersion of P. aeruginosa biofilms and this phenomenon
involves genes required for arginine metabolism (Sauer et al.,
Journal of bacteriology. 2004 186(21): 7312-7326). Figure 4
shows that in S. gordonii the gene encoding ArcR, the regulator
of arginine deiminase system genes, is required for biofilm
formation by S. gordonii since a strain lacking the arcR gene
does not form strong biofilms. Therefore L-arginine is a central
regulator of biofilm formation.
Example 2
This example describes the impact of L-arginine on oral bio
films that contain species grown under conditions representative
of the human oral cavity. Using a microfluidic-based approach,
using human saliva as the inoculum and 25% filter- sterilized
human saliva as the nutrient source, it was demonstrated that
HCL-balanced L-arginine (LAHCL) destabilizes oral biofilms in a
concentration dependent manner. Destabilization was expressed as
loss of biofilm structure and change in bacterial community
membership, as determined by confocal laser scanning microscopy
and 454 pyrosequencing. Very limited antimicrobial effects were
evident and only detected as a consequence of biofilm
perturbation, and the optimal concentration for destabilization
was between 50 and 500mM. No substantial changes in pH were
recorded, due to the use of HC1 balanced L-arginine (L-arginine
monohydro chloride) and the buffering capacity of human saliva.
As traditional approaches to control oral biofilms rely heavily
on antimicrobials and L-arginine was demonstrated a
destabilizing effect, synergy with other antimicrobials to more
effectively inactivate biofilm cells was investigated. Mixing
L-arginine with cetylpyridinium chloride (CPC) resulted in at
least five times greater biofilm inactivation (by live/dead
staining). Taken collectively, it was demonstrated that
L-arginine has broad oral biofilm destabilizing effects under
conditions representative of the human mouth. Such effects are
used to remove biofilms or enhance traditional CPC-based
antimicrobial treatment strategies. Results are shown in Figures
5-11. Figure 5 shows changes in community composition of
L-arginine (500 mM) treated bio films. Figure 6 shows the effect
of L-arginine (CLSM) on multi-species bio films of bacteria in
saliva derived community developed in pooled filter sterilized
saliva in a static (non-flowing) microplate system. 500mM
L-arginine destabilized multi-species oral biofilm communities
to reduce biofilm biomass (and therefore total numbers of
bacteria, including pathogens) and also makes the biofilm more
diffuse with respect to architechture. No substantial killing
was observed although there is a slight statistically
significant increase in red "signal" indicating that the
non-responsive
dead/damaged cells are left behind in the biofilm.
Figure 7 shows Representative 3D renderings and biofilm
characteristics derived from computational image analysis of
oral biofilms developed for 20 h in different concentrations of
L-arginine monohydro chloride (LAHC1) in the Bioflux™ flowing
saliva biofilm system. Green signal indicates viable live cells
and red signal indicates damaged/dead cells.
Associated table shows changes in cell viability, biofilm
biomass, thickness, and roughness. Data derived from at-least 18
renderings across three experiments and standard deviations are
shown in brackets. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; **P<0.001 :
significant differences from the CFS control.
Figure 8 shows that 500mM L-arginine destabilizes pre-formed
multi-species oral biofilms of differing developmental age.
Figure 9 shows that L-arginine destabilizes multi-species oral
biofilm communities to enhance the penetration of CPC. As a
consequence, lower CPC concentrations are used to achieve the
same level of killing/inactivation/cell damage.
Figure 10 shows fold induction of luciferase production in the
Vibrio harveyi reporter strain BB170 normalized to a positive
control (BB152). A control run of plain CFS (cell-free saliva)
with the given concentrations of arginine was compared to
microfluidics efflux, which contains any secreted molecules from
bacteria grown with the given concentration of L- arginine.
Values were produced by first taking averages of 4 trials at
each concentration and dividing them by the average for the
negative control, creating an induction number. The amount of
AI-2 produced from multi-species biofilms increases as the
concentrations of arginine used to treat them increases. This
indicates that L-arginine energizes bacterial communities,
because AI-2 is a proxy for metabolism. High AI-2 may also have
a destabilizing effect on the community, which could explain or
contribute to the structural changes seen in the biofilms.
Figure 11 shows that application of L-arginine disrupts
bacterial biofilm communities but D-arginine does not have the
same effect. Therefore the destabilizing effects of arginine are
specific to the L-form.
In conclusion, these examples demonstrate that L-arginine
reduces the pathogenic potential of bio films by reducing the
biofilm biomass and reducing the total amount and proportion of
pathogens; L-arginine augments/enhances the activity of
antimicrobials such as CPC. This is through enhancing access of
antimicrobial by loosening biofilm and also by altering the
growth-rate of the bacteria; L-arginine causes cell-cell
signaling dysregulation; L- arginine is a combinational
treatment that up-regulates metabolism, alters cell-cell
signaling, and inhibits cell-cell adhesion; and L-arginine
increases the proportion of beneficial bacteria that can combat
the negative effects of pathogens such as S. mutans. The
proportion of Veillonella species are increased in biofilms as
are the proportions of non-cariogenic streptococci.
Example 3
A plasmid (See e.g., Figure 12) was utilized to monitor
expression of reporter genes in the presence of arginine or
AI-2. The ??????? backbone described in England et al. (Proc
Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 Nov 30;101(48): 16917-22. Epub 2004
Nov 16) was modified to express fluorescent genes such as GFP or
Mcherry in S. gordonii DL1 or other species of streptococci.
Specifically, promoters from differentially regulated genes are
inserted upstream of a GFP or Mcherry gene harbored on ???????
(or similar streptococcal plasmid shuttle vector system) to be
differentially expressed (Figure 12A and 12B). An example was
performed (Figure 12B) showing minimal differential expression
by a 50S ribosomal protein (SGO l 192; gene rplJ responsible for
the highly abundant 50S ribosomal protein L10) when exposed to
exogenously added autoinducer-2 (AI-2) as compared to
drastically different gene expression by the catabolite control
protein A (SGO 0773; ccpA). The plasmid provides constitutive
-producing fluorescent probes for monitoring bacteria in
biofilms and reporter systems that report arginine (or AI-2)
concentrations in biofilms such as those found in dental plaque
biofilms.
US2011236508
L-ARGININE-BASED
FORMULATION FOR ORAL ABSORPTION
A formulation comprising large quantities of l-arginine and/or
fat plaque dissolving agents which is palatable, stench free,
and does not evoke nausea. The formulation is adapted to
facilitate the adsorption of l-arginine to the blood system and
to introduce high levels of l-arginine and/or other fat plaque
dissolving agents such as EDTA, its derivatives or its salts
into the blood system which are sufficient for effectively
dissolving fat plaques in the artery. The formulation comprises
at least 10% (w/w) L-arginine, edible organic acids,
emulsifier(s), preservatives, flavorings, ethanol and water.
Other embodiments may further include chromium salts, and EDTA
or its derivatives and their salts
DE102010003280
Oral-,
dental care- and -cleaning products, useful for plaque
reduction and/or caries prevention...
Oral-, dental care- and -cleaning products comprise at least one
oligo- or polypeptide of vegetable origin, in which the molar
ratio of basic amino acids (arginine, histidine and lysine) to
acids and semi-acidic amino acids (aspartic acid, glutamic acid,
tyrosine and cysteine) is greater than 1. An independent claim
is included for reducing plaque and/or preventing caries,
comprising packing the products in the form of a toothpaste and
using for cleaning the teeth using a toothbrush, or packing in
the form of a mouthwash and using for rinsing the oral cavity.
US5874068
Stabilized
antiplaque and antigingivitis oral compositions containing N
alpha -alkyl-L-arginine alkyl ester salts
Also published as: WO9929289
An antiplaque and antigingivitis effective oral composition
containing a stabilized N alpha -acyl acidic amino acid ester
salt is disclosed. Also disclosed is a method for inhibiting
plaque buildup in the oral cavity with an oral composition
containing the stabilized N alpha -acyl acidic amino acid ester
salt.
JP3803695
ANTIMICROBIAL
PREPARATION
Also published as: JP3803695
PURPOSE: To obtain an antimicrobial preparation exhibiting
excellent antimicrobial activity against the aggregate and lump
of microorganisms, such as a biofilm or plaque, which can
substantially not be controlled with an antimicrobial agent a
lone. CONSTITUTION: The antimicrobial preparation contains
0.001-10wt.% of arginine or its derivative and 0.001-10wt.% of a
compound exhibiting antimicrobial activity. The further addition
of 0.005-5wt.% of at least a surfactant selected from a nonionic
surfactant and an amphoteric surfactant to the antimicrobial
preparation gives the more excellent antimicrobial effect. The
compound exhibiting the antimicrobial activity includes cationic
antimicrobial agents (e.g. cetylpyridinium chloride), fluorides,
natural antimicrobial agents (e.g. thymol, oil-soluble
glycyrrhiza extract, a polyphenol), trichlosan, and
isopropylmethylphenol.; The nonionic surfactant is preferably a
polyethylene oxide-polypropylene oxide block copolymer, and the
amphoteric surfactant is preferably a palm oil fatty acid amide
propylbetaine.
JPH09286712
COMPOSITION FOR ORAL CAVITY
PROBLEM TO BE SOLVED: To obtain a composition for oral cavity,
capable of promoting absorption of a cationic disinfectant to
the surface of tooth and excellent in prevention of formation of
dental plaque and prevention of decayed tooth. SOLUTION: This
composition for oral cavity is obtained by blending a cationic
disinfectant such as gluconic acid chlorohexidine with an N long
chain acyl basic amino acid lower alkyl ester or its salt such
as N-cocoil-L-arginine ethylester-pyrrolidone carboxylic acid
salt and a pH adjuster such as citric acid so as to keep pH to
5.5 to 6.5. Thereby, largest absorption amount of the
disinfectant is obtained, especially in a region of pH5.5 to 6.5
and absorption to dental surface is promoted in the region.
JP3566374
COMPOSITION FOR ORAL CAVITY
PURPOSE:To obtain a composition for oral cavity having an
excellent suppression effect of pH reduction of a bacterial
plaque, constituted by containing arginine, canavanine or their
salts, and a carbon dioxide producing agent or carbon dioxide.
CONSTITUTION:Arginine, canavanine which is an arginine analog,
and their salts of 0.05-20wt.%, and a carbon dioxide producing
agent or carbon dioxide of 0.5-20wt.% are contained in this
composition. Further, a calcium ion capturing agent of
0.05-50wt.% is contained in it as indispensable component, and
the other optional components which are added in an usual
composition for oral cavity, are added to adjust pH of 5-10,
when it is dissolved in water of 10 fold amount.; By combining
arginine, canavanie or their salts having a high safety and the
carbon dioxide producing agent or carbon dioxide, with a
manifestation of suppressing effect of lactic acid production,
together with promoting effect of its decomposition, a reduction
of pH of a bacterial plaque is suppressed. Since, even taking a
food containing sucrose at the same time, the pH lowering is
suppressed, a cariogenicity is reduced, and it is useful in
fields of quasi-drug, a cosmetic and a food, and capable of
changing a bacterial flora in the oral cavity to a flora rich
with a goody bacteria.
EP0711543
/ CN1156022 / CN1093756
Oral preparations
The present invention relates to oral preparations having
anti-caries activity. The compositions comprise pyruvic acid or
an orally-acceptable salt thereof, and urea and/or arginine or a
derivative thereof. This combination induces a pH-rise in the
plaque.